From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: xxiao <austinxxh-ath9k@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [ath9k-devel] 802.11n support in ad-hoc mode?
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890911030926q3882f0dcub6c5b9291a5634d0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <939678.71961.qm@web55303.mail.re4.yahoo.com>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

working on that(IBSS/HT/MCS) in my spare time, still no success. Probably I will try the debugfs approach you suggested. 

MCS-unaware is OK for IBSS only if it can do rate control at HT, but so far I could not achieve that, at least not reliably.

xxiao

--- On Tue, 11/3/09, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] 802.11n support in ad-hoc mode?
> To: austinxxh-ath9k at yahoo.com
> Cc: ath9k-devel at venema.h4ckr.net, "LAMBA Jaideep" <Jaideep.Lamba@alcatel-lucent.com>
> Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2009, 11:26 AM
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:06 AM, xxiao
> <austinxxh-ath9k@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > This is correct, current HT(high-throughput) is
> unsupported in ath9k, or any open source 11N driver as far
> as IBSS mode is concerned.
> 
> You're using MCS rates on IBSS?
> 
> ? Luis
>