From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] kvm: nVMX: Checkpoint/restore support for VMX state
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:31:39 +0100
Message-ID: <93c3c1ff-2aa5-c4cf-3837-8b9549ee754f@redhat.com>
References: <1480536229-11754-1-git-send-email-jmattson@google.com>
 <4e2df8e6-0c1b-5d57-0247-bd7cd69c3e12@redhat.com>
 <CALMp9eRQrG3ZW83Ve+VW+nJmvo2MVu1-gfZVH0N5yC_5ZPV-7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <52584419-5c45-3e22-4c18-8d62894d7437@redhat.com>
 <CALMp9eTvAJQxBrFviea=OS6yXQKs=B1hovzRxEoVfNgROtrD4w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58680 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750719AbdBORbg (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:31:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CALMp9eTvAJQxBrFviea=OS6yXQKs=B1hovzRxEoVfNgROtrD4w@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>



On 15/02/2017 18:02, Jim Mattson wrote:
> Should I send that missing patch? Rework the set? Do a cleanup after
> you check in? I appreciate all the work that you've done, and I'd like
> to do whatever makes the most sense to move forward.

Cleanup after I check in.  I will do some tests with KVM and/or Hyper-V
L1 and get the first six patches in 4.11.

Paolo