From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35663) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3MNH-0003vW-2c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:48:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3MNG-0003mQ-Gh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:48:51 -0400 References: <20170413203401.3213-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <20170419154949.GF5826@noname.redhat.com> From: Max Reitz Message-ID: <93dfeca5-c43f-b753-4c29-ab9811b6359a@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:48:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170419154949.GF5826@noname.redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kkJJ7oPrxkhijMpFonKVDUOWO6pEpuulq" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10 0/3] qemu-img/convert: Some small fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eric Blake This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --kkJJ7oPrxkhijMpFonKVDUOWO6pEpuulq From: Max Reitz To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eric Blake Message-ID: <93dfeca5-c43f-b753-4c29-ab9811b6359a@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH for-2.10 0/3] qemu-img/convert: Some small fixes References: <20170413203401.3213-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <20170419154949.GF5826@noname.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170419154949.GF5826@noname.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19.04.2017 17:49, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 13.04.2017 um 22:33 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: >> This series fixes some small issues I found in qemu-img's convert >> subcommand while reviewing Dan's convert/dd series. >> >> Nothing serious at all, so all for 2.10. >=20 > This series conflicts with Peter Lieven's "qemu-img: simplify > img_convert" in my block-next branch. >=20 > Patch 1 is unnecessary now (ret is still -EINVAL at this point), the > other two probably just need rebasing. Hm... What should I do about qemu-stable, though? I don't think that Peter's series will end up there, so qemu-stable should probably indeed take v1... Max --kkJJ7oPrxkhijMpFonKVDUOWO6pEpuulq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEkb62CjDbPohX0Rgp9AfbAGHVz0AFAlkAlyoSHG1yZWl0ekBy ZWRoYXQuY29tAAoJEPQH2wBh1c9AKbIH/A9m5fBwhhZkum0xbqp1q2tRh2hwdu+B OC3z67sehgrFI2fEQoXwSVjbQDRG16BFbLcAWHebaO24rxRRsU3LGkyeUptYPPUU GleuiJmcCORq8QTpHDRVUDQpBQFrFwqmo9qWspg4lpYzzp4hz0yqRG2N0FcWfLg/ nGEg+04HjJ1lNim+oCl+PrDlf+6HNtGJvAUfiBLv1pl7GVvFO/nAlgR3caT7NQx8 K013t9bFG4QtBRg8iKKgXLvzh9UeIW8eWZctKJ80jxazV5pK3o4QD9wwLpUe+GWE aj7Y/QLYV+JF0NLBS1D/zK3JxhmHihdOpksgdbiO+im2QP5zsloqYo4= =ID2m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kkJJ7oPrxkhijMpFonKVDUOWO6pEpuulq--