From: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>
Cc: "James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2] scsi_lib: removes ambiguous "Unhandled error code" messages.
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:38:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B402958B4C8CD@G9W0745.americas.hpqcorp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140625110632.GE19181@infradead.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-scsi-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 June, 2014 6:07 AM
> To: Maurizio Lombardi
> Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
> hch@infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi_lib: removes ambiguous "Unhandled error code"
> messages.
>
> Can I get another review for this one?
>
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 10:10:35AM +0200, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
...
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
...
> > @@ -955,14 +955,12 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,
> unsigned int good_bytes)
> > action = ACTION_FAIL;
> > break;
> > default:
> > - description = "Unhandled sense code";
> > + description = "Failing command with sense code:";
The default case handles sense keys other than:
#define NOT_READY 0x02
#define ILLEGAL_REQUEST 0x05
#define UNIT_ATTENTION 0x06
#define ABORTED_COMMAND 0x0b
#define VOLUME_OVERFLOW 0x0d
which means these #defines (and any other values)
#define NO_SENSE 0x00
#define RECOVERED_ERROR 0x01
#define MEDIUM_ERROR 0x03
#define HARDWARE_ERROR 0x04
#define DATA_PROTECT 0x07
#define BLANK_CHECK 0x08
#define COPY_ABORTED 0x0a
#define MISCOMPARE 0x0e
The other description strings that result in ACTION_FAIL are based
on the sense key and sometimes the additional sense code:
description = "Media Changed";
description = "Host Data Integrity Failure";
description = "Discard failure";
description = "Write same failure";
description = "Invalid command failure";
description = "Target Data Integrity Failure";
description = "Device not ready";
Also, there is this one, which is not based on the sense key:
description = "Command timed out";
Since the ACTION_FAIL case always prints the sense key
and additional sense code:
if (!(req->cmd_flags & REQ_QUIET)) {
if (description)
scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, cmd, " % \n",
description);
scsi_print_result(cmd);
if (driver_byte(result) & DRIVER_SENSE)
scsi_print_sense("", cmd);
scsi_print_command(cmd);
}
perhaps the description string should be removed altogether?
In this example:
sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Unhandled sense code
sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb]
Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb]
Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb]
Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] CDB:
Read(10): 28 00 00 18 f8 a8 00 00 08 00
end_request: critical medium error, dev sdb, sector 1636520
"Sense Key : Medium Error" is much more informative than
"Unhandled sense code" or "Failing command with sense code".
All the other descriptions represent failing commands,
so using different wording is a bit confusing.
For the "Unhandled error code" (for which you are proposing
removing the string) and the timeout case, the scsi_print_result
call already prints hostbyte and driverbyte, which explain what
happened in more detail:
sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Unhandled error code
sd 1:0:0:0: [sda]
Result: hostbyte=DID_TIME_OUT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] CDB:
Test Unit Ready:
end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 481013632
---
Rob Elliott HP Server Storage
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-25 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 8:10 [PATCH V2] scsi_lib: removes ambiguous "Unhandled error code" messages Maurizio Lombardi
2014-06-06 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-25 11:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-25 20:38 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) [this message]
2014-07-03 8:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-08 8:36 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2014-07-09 10:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-06-25 17:41 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B402958B4C8CD@G9W0745.americas.hpqcorp.net \
--to=elliott@hp.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.