From: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com>
To: "Kudryavtsev, Andrey O" <andrey.o.kudryavtsev@intel.com>,
Andrey Kuzmin <andrey.v.kuzmin@gmail.com>
Cc: "fio@vger.kernel.org" <fio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: REPORT: FIO random read performance degradation without "norandommap" option
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:56:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B40295A732BE0@G9W0745.americas.hpqcorp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D0D9732D.107AC%andrey.o.kudryavtsev@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kudryavtsev, Andrey O [mailto:andrey.o.kudryavtsev@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, 12 January, 2015 3:06 PM
> To: Andrey Kuzmin
> Cc: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage); fio@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: REPORT: FIO random read performance degradation without
> "norandommap" option
>
> Hi Andrey,
> Thank you, it explains the purpose of this feature. Unfortunately it was
> not clear to me from the manual, I faulty supposed it increases the
> randomness of the random generator distribution. Thanks again!
>
> I’d propose to have it auto set to "norandommap" if “randread” workload is
> specified. Does it make sense?
>
I don't think I'd change it. For randread, randommap ensures that each
LBA has been accessed once before it repeats reading any of the LBAs. That
could be useful in some cases, like scanning the media (ensuring you've
read each LBA).
---
Rob Elliott HP Server Storage
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-12 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-09 22:42 REPORT: FIO random read performance degradation without "norandommap" option Kudryavtsev, Andrey O
2015-01-09 22:49 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2015-01-09 23:01 ` Kudryavtsev, Andrey O
2015-01-10 9:20 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2015-01-12 21:06 ` Kudryavtsev, Andrey O
2015-01-12 22:56 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) [this message]
2015-01-09 23:07 ` Kulkarni, Vasu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B40295A732BE0@G9W0745.americas.hpqcorp.net \
--to=elliott@hp.com \
--cc=andrey.o.kudryavtsev@intel.com \
--cc=andrey.v.kuzmin@gmail.com \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.