From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A53C433E1 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7CCC20720 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=xen.org header.i=@xen.org header.b="U2X0xk96" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E7CCC20720 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jnNQG-0005Hf-3b; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:27:44 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jnNQE-0005HY-AK for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:27:42 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 87d9c4e0-b494-11ea-be9b-12813bfff9fa Received: from mail.xenproject.org (unknown [104.130.215.37]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 87d9c4e0-b494-11ea-be9b-12813bfff9fa; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:27:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WNRA0zhjXm1fdNAIxQSe9Rf2cnK9w/uNmAyFaZ5paFA=; b=U2X0xk96ZjnPE6QM1XTxDqxFnK IQdOy1VjsEqLscVTWQn+NvM+Uj+0jmWlrXNWxcs73vV8O4HSHCN4A5Ge96tdVWENypvwJP8ByZdaa 47V5jaA57EZ2rQOZs/lvvIaBK+NjvSa6NDFw8TJ6BN0LA2e83V3JCimYH5zKhDspvxog=; Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jnNQB-00008g-Mg; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:27:39 +0000 Received: from [54.239.6.187] (helo=a483e7b01a66.ant.amazon.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jnNQB-0003fH-GK; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:27:39 +0000 Subject: Re: UEFI support in ARM DomUs To: Oleksandr Andrushchenko , Stefano Stabellini , Julien Grall References: <54dcfce1-c401-0581-8620-dc8790209a87@xen.org> From: Julien Grall Message-ID: <94bfe57c-c1be-62b4-3799-b90415264487@xen.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:27:37 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Anastasiia Lukianenko , Juergen Gross , Peng Fan , Oleksandr Andrushchenko , Roman Shaposhnik , Bertrand Marquis , Nataliya Korovkina , Xen-devel Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Hi Oleksandr, On 22/06/2020 15:04, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > On 6/19/20 11:02 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Jun 2020, Julien Grall wrote: > ifeq ($(CONFIG_XEN),y) > arch-y += -D__XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__=0x00040d00 > endif > > and we also have Xen 4.13 headers in the U-boot tree. Sorry if this was already asked before. Why do you need to specify __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__? > > For the first part (__XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__) I think we can provide it via > > CFLAGS or something. This can also be done for the location of Xen headers. __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__ should work through the CFLAGS. An alternative would be to allow the user to specify through the Kconfig. Cheers, -- Julien Grall