All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, fabioaiuto83@gmail.com,
	ross.schm.dev@gmail.com, deborahbrouwer3563@gmail.com,
	marcocesati@gmail.com, phil@philpotter.co.uk,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: simplify the if condition
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 18:51:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94cb79ea-1952-c92c-f5c9-f03f7b1a892c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWEwFf0YMi4W1xKN@user>

Hi,

On 10/9/21 8:00 AM, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> if psta is NULL, function is returning with fail. On next if condition
> again checking if psta is not a NULL. Remove multiple if condition check.
> 
> Function is already using goto exit statement to exit.Replace multiple
> return with goto exit statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c | 61 ++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
> index 34505b35a7f3..4e4a1bed882b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
> @@ -932,49 +932,40 @@ s32 rtw_make_wlanhdr(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *hdr, struct pkt_attrib *pattr
>  		/* TODO: fill HT Control Field */
> 
>  		/* Update Seq Num will be handled by f/w */
> -		{
> -			struct sta_info *psta;
> -
> -			psta = rtw_get_stainfo(&padapter->stapriv, pattrib->ra);
> -			if (pattrib->psta != psta)
> -				return _FAIL;
> -
> -			if (!psta)
> -				return _FAIL;
> +		struct sta_info *psta;

You are now declaring a variable after some statements, this will
cause a compiler warning in some cases. Please move this variable
declaration up, grouping it together with the other variable
declarations.

> 
> -			if (!(psta->state & _FW_LINKED))
> -				return _FAIL;
> +		psta = rtw_get_stainfo(&padapter->stapriv, pattrib->ra);
> +		if (!psta || pattrib->psta != psta || !(psta->state & _FW_LINKED))
> +			res = _FAIL;
> +			goto exit;

You are both removing an identation level here because you are removing
the compound statement which contained the psta declaration as well
as refactoring the code.

Please split this into 2 separate commits, 1 where you only drop the
extra indentation level (and move the psta declaration up).

And then a separate commit which just the actual code changes.

Your current patch is very hard to review because you are doing
2 things at once.

Also it looks like this patch depends on your previous patch:
"[PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: remove empty else section"

When patches depend on each other please send them together
as a single patch series. E.g. for version 2 (v2) of a 3 patch
series consisting of the last 3 commits in your local tree use
(so the next version of these patches) use:

git format-patch -v2 --cover-letter HEAD~3
$editor v2-0000-cover-letter.patch 
 <describe series contents + what was changed in the cover-letter>
git send-email v2-00*.patch

Regards,

Hans


> 
> -			if (psta) {
> -				psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority]++;
> -				psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority] &= 0xFFF;
> -				pattrib->seqnum = psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority];
> +		psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority]++;
> +		psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority] &= 0xFFF;
> +		pattrib->seqnum = psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority];
> 
> -				SetSeqNum(hdr, pattrib->seqnum);
> +		SetSeqNum(hdr, pattrib->seqnum);
> 
> -				/* check if enable ampdu */
> -				if (pattrib->ht_en && psta->htpriv.ampdu_enable)
> -					if (psta->htpriv.agg_enable_bitmap & BIT(pattrib->priority))
> -						pattrib->ampdu_en = true;
> +		/* check if enable ampdu */
> +		if (pattrib->ht_en && psta->htpriv.ampdu_enable)
> +			if (psta->htpriv.agg_enable_bitmap & BIT(pattrib->priority))
> +				pattrib->ampdu_en = true;
> 
> -				/* re-check if enable ampdu by BA_starting_seqctrl */
> -				if (pattrib->ampdu_en == true) {
> -					u16 tx_seq;
> +		/* re-check if enable ampdu by BA_starting_seqctrl */
> +		if (pattrib->ampdu_en == true) {
> +			u16 tx_seq;
> 
> -					tx_seq = psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f];
> +			tx_seq = psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f];
> 
> -					/* check BA_starting_seqctrl */
> -					if (SN_LESS(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
> -						pattrib->ampdu_en = false;/* AGG BK */
> -					} else if (SN_EQUAL(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
> -						psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (tx_seq+1)&0xfff;
> +			/* check BA_starting_seqctrl */
> +			if (SN_LESS(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
> +				pattrib->ampdu_en = false;/* AGG BK */
> +			} else if (SN_EQUAL(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
> +				psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (tx_seq+1)&0xfff;
> 
> -						pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
> -					} else {
> -						psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (pattrib->seqnum+1)&0xfff;
> -						pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
> -					}
> -				}
> +				pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
> +			} else {
> +				psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (pattrib->seqnum+1)&0xfff;
> +				pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
> --
> 2.32.0
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-09 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-09  6:00 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: simplify the if condition Saurav Girepunje
2021-10-09 16:51 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2021-10-09 18:14   ` Saurav Girepunje
2021-10-11 12:09 ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94cb79ea-1952-c92c-f5c9-f03f7b1a892c@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=deborahbrouwer3563@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabioaiuto83@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=marcocesati@gmail.com \
    --cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
    --cc=ross.schm.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=saurav.girepunje@gmail.com \
    --cc=saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.