From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] memzone: improve zero-length memzone reserve Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 09:21:06 +0100 Message-ID: <952c259e-eb94-0a8d-7966-00e3591f9c37@intel.com> References: <777ae6b10a7524e188c07ba14e576fc7b0e21018.1524729978.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com To: Remy Horton , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2EA1C0ED for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 10:21:09 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 11-May-18 11:25 AM, Remy Horton wrote: > > On 03/05/2018 18:18, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > [..] >> Also, fixup unit tests to account for the new behavior. > > Tried running the tests but it fails on a boundary check: > > RTE>>memzone_autotest > test basic memzone API > [...] > 1GB Huge pages available > test alignment for memzone_reserve > check alignments and lengths > check overlapping > test boundary alignment for memzone_reserve > check_memzone_bounded(MZ_TEST_bounded_128): invalid memzone boundary 128 > crossed > Test Failed > RTE>> > Hi Remy, Passes here, but i'll look into it, thanks for the report. -- Thanks, Anatoly