From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com (lelv0143.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.248]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.1141.1639098370572318852 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 17:06:10 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17q1 header.b=popRRNve; spf=pass (domain: ti.com, ip: 198.47.23.248, mailfrom: yogeshs@ti.com) Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1BA165tR020668; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:06:05 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1639098365; bh=hvzeeDRJI5oAMQJNTtvFrunXtlowvARkNuF5dGmrXks=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=popRRNveaZXE4jY7mw/FPgYcsNS6ExVqWzUnj/pRPEQbUedSAFbZABjMNxlBO4SlF CwDtk5a0+XY1jCvN+QAGepwLqt9WfT1NQbMZxDN3UTd9mzJrqtXZzze7W1Moe589LC UqU4NXP6DgD9NbdKAZiiYa3bxOubtlsn5l4z+Z18= Received: from DFLE112.ent.ti.com (dfle112.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.33]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1BA165XC055438 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:06:05 -0600 Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) by DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:06:04 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:06:04 -0600 Received: from [10.249.36.229] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1BA164A0030148; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:06:04 -0600 Message-ID: <957e0aa8-f37c-a475-ab46-13b726f61855@ti.com> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:06:04 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: [meta-arago] [meta-ti][master/dunfell][PATCH] conf: j7200-hs: fix the wrong machine configuration included To: Denys Dmytriyenko CC: Praneeth Bajjuri , Denys Dmytriyenko , References: <20211210004321.23793-1-yogeshs@ti.com> <20211210004635.GC18191@denix.org> From: "Yogesh Siraswar" In-Reply-To: <20211210004635.GC18191@denix.org> X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/9/2021 6:46 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > Wrong list? > Used wrong alias. Please ignore > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:43:21AM +0000, Yogesh Siraswar via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: >> j7-evm instead of j7200-evm was included causing boot failure >> >> Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar >> --- >> conf/machine/j7200-hs-evm.conf | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/conf/machine/j7200-hs-evm.conf b/conf/machine/j7200-hs-evm.conf >> index c55be005..a5bd637e 100644 >> --- a/conf/machine/j7200-hs-evm.conf >> +++ b/conf/machine/j7200-hs-evm.conf >> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ >> #@NAME: J7200 HS EVM >> #@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for the TI J7200 HS EVM >> >> -require conf/machine/j7-evm.conf >> +require conf/machine/j7200-evm.conf >> >> UBOOT_MACHINE = "j7200_hs_evm_a72_defconfig" >> >> -- >> 2.17.1