Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/2] s390x: firq: floating interrupt test

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/*
>>>>> +	 * We want CPU #2 to be stopped. This should be the case at this
>>>>> +	 * point, however, we want to sense if it even exists as well.
>>>>> +	 */
>>>>> +	ret = smp_cpu_stop(2);
>>>>> +	if (ret) {
>>>>> +		report_skip("CPU #2 not found");
>>>>
>>>> Since you already queried for the availablity of at least 3 CPUs above, I
>>>> think you could turn this into a report_fail() instead?
>>>
>>> either that or an assert, but again, no strong opinions
>>>
>>
>> Just because there are >= 3 CPUs doesn't imply that CPU #2 is around.
> 
> Ok, fair point. But if #2 is not around, it means that the test has been run 
> in the wrong way by the user... I wonder what's better in that case - to 
> skip this test or to go out with a bang. Skipping the test has the advantage 
> of looking a little bit more "polite", but it has the disadvantage that it 
> might get lost in automation, e.g. if somebody enabled the test in their CI, 
> but did something wrong in the settings, they might not notice that the test 
> is not run at all...

I sticked to what we have in s390x/smp.c, where we fail if we only have
a single CPU.

But I don't particularly care (and have to move on doing other stuff),
so I'll do whatever maintainers want and resend :)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb