From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Rybchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drivers: advertise kmod dependencies in pmdinfo Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:21:14 +0300 Message-ID: <96cb80d2-d0ff-b233-3e0a-226f0ec6109a@solarflare.com> References: <1479808257-8725-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <1481809599-27896-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20161216082332.GB10340@6wind.com> <2489002.JyIsi2jNCp@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrien Mazarguil , , , , , To: Thomas Monjalon , Olivier Matz Return-path: Received: from nbfkord-smmo02.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo02.seg.att.com [209.65.160.78]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E134C10B82 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:21:28 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <2489002.JyIsi2jNCp@xps13> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 12/20/2016 08:26 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> Add a new macro RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP() that allows a driver to >>> declare the list of kernel modules required to run properly. >>> >>> Today, most PCI drivers require uio/vfio. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz >>> Acked-by: Fiona Trahe >> Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil > Applied in main tree, thanks Is there any plan on how it will be done/solved for a new drivers in dpdk-next-net? Should I care about it for sfc? Andrew.