From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::331; helo=mail-ot1-x331.google.com; envelope-from=kurt.r.taylor@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=XqM34JOo; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48PMyp1dtZzDqlp for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 07:10:41 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id g64so3107034otb.13 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:10:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X2jqUNDYNdEFt7xWFKWQW6mHg4zwdYmL2f4VJWcUgF4=; b=XqM34JOoJTDfzIdR3U6TJwtLDhkUAuCWdF74oh4QRocvDh9Dih9+i33sfxfn+wCdak zH2oaNGXLyb67ay0AkKqwt4Uct/nzV2L4h9eNDKCEkq9iGmZKU5FjiKxrSuwhKuqerdo Zb3ZrjZnhKeEcZij3p112Ko6WcdEfvzqIE1mkycxsYddEXXOXZa9104VJdpdSCuHSKhi d/vek3EALi+h9JUckihGqKNiXFIMvypo0MrxkDXCahZPGVbrfr8fpA9BTzHoR356jl0J vl2Nh6vSeThshot4dVA1htQUZu8hnxPsslKp+8mYF4lEKUQYGGGOuIxScaXwtGg+cK0k 3jkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=X2jqUNDYNdEFt7xWFKWQW6mHg4zwdYmL2f4VJWcUgF4=; b=bHNCxwmMHKPBKs+uWUW6mUIXBTY1rlklXQBqJXcDaX1kmwjplfnLSfSDdGd1KNaAFv D/bmNIQFUvcSH+M/Fgp+yUT+UznXl2Y94Aa3BooZQrIGf1SSMrpF/7RWLN/YLx6RkOAr wUfvrHVLwzpyXEkcWsaWKA27ffhqDDFwQ0vd0cFsh8NOpQw2MXAGlnaGJuoiItESkLE1 NauOAEapQuJiAEUOKlmpSukW6YbM1nQ873CJjBLOZGKh/osDTJhaxa8mQwIV0OkJMp1M FjdqiM4Bsk2sWwEHUWpR7JeDnpdtgNnk/KR7goleiivYip5zzKfC4HT82Kw8D1pyaIHn CKkA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV1doSFE39x2QM7RLxUWFy5eSN6+N6P8YPBHZs2WCX9XsRNIeWQ VTwyAUypZqd7WMaLnX9bT9V9veJp X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQac8jVkdBQouw2gXpntUwWmnKBXsdx7fkeAEuXRtyNKih4N7e+EJndt5daSVF/sbm4vFkHA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4c14:: with SMTP id l20mr29472167otf.125.1582315837038; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:10:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from krtaylors-MacBook-Pro.local (072-182-100-019.res.spectrum.com. [72.182.100.19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j13sm1224521oij.56.2020.02.21.12.10.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:10:36 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: sdbusplus commits missing CLA To: Patrick Williams Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org References: <20200220203546.GF41328@patrickw3-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: krtaylor Message-ID: <97f984a2-e975-c620-7fc3-e3b7defb75ea@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:10:35 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200220203546.GF41328@patrickw3-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 20:10:43 -0000 On 2/20/20 2:35 PM, Patrick Williams wrote: > Kurt, (Not a lawyer) > We have a few commits for the openbmc/sdbusplus repository that have > been floating around in Gerrit since early 2018 and seem to be stuck in > "missing CLA limbo". It appears that there was some discussion on the > CLA at one point but I don't know what happened to it. I don't see a > CLA from the Bosch company in the Google Doc folder. I have not received a CLA from Bosch, or an ICLA from the developer(s) referenced. > https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/q/owner:mark.jonas%2540de.bosch.com > > There was recently a request to revive this work because someone else is > finding it useful (and we've had a feature request open for a long time > on one of them as well). What options do we, the maintainers, have in > this situation? We cannot accept/merge the code until resolved. If they cannot complete a ICLA/CCLA for this submission, it should be abandoned. > I don't really want to blindly reimplement this feature since there was > good work done here. There appears to have been no plagiarism issues. > Since the commits have a S-O-B by two people from the same company, it > seems reasonable that they fully intended to contribute this work > publicly. I'm not looking to restart a "why do we have CLAs" CLA's protect the company, individual and the project. We must have permission from the company that a developer they are employing has their permission to submit code to the project. If they don't care, that is what the ICLA is for. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) > discussion, but it seems like we need some direction on what maintainers > should do when there is a missing CLA. >