All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Jiang, YuX" <yux.jiang@intel.com>,
	"Alvin Zhang" <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	"Guo, Junfeng" <junfeng.guo@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, "Zhang, AlvinX" <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: disable source pruning
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:35:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86ECE@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB27115E8BB2D913011F82C3E3FE3A9@BYAPR11MB2711.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

> From: Jiang, YuX [mailto:yux.jiang@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, 21 February 2022 09.31
> 
> > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Alvin Zhang
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 9:29 AM
> >
> > VRRP advertisement packets are dropped on i40e PF devices because
> when
> > a MAC address is added to a device, packets originating from that MAC
> > address are dropped.
> >
> > This patch adds a devarg to support disabling source pruning to work
> around
> > above issue.
> >
> > Bugzilla ID: 648
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alvin Zhang <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>
> > ---
> Tested-by:  Yu Jiang <YuX.Jiang@intel.com>
> 
> Verified patchset
> http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211020012831.8480-1-
> alvinx.zhang@intel.com/ on baseline dpdk22.03-rc1:ecc0dd455e
> "raw/cnxk_gpio: add option to select subset of GPIOs"
> Tested pass on Ethernet Controller XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ 1583, OS:
> Fedora Linux 35/5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64
> Test step as below:
>  ./dpdk-testpmd -l 1,2 -n 1 -a 18:00.0,disable_source_pruning=1 -- -i
>  pkt = Ether(src="00:00:5E:00:01:0A")/IP()/Raw("x"*60)
>  test steps:
> 1). testpmd>set verbose 1
>     testpmd>start
> 2). Send the pkt, the pkt can be received by testpmd
> 3). testpmd>mac_addr add 0 00:00:5E:00:01:0A
> 4). Re-send the pkt, the pkt still can be received by testpmd.

If source pruning is not the default behavior of all NICs, it should be disabled by default in the i40e NIC too.

A NIC shouldn't drop any packets unless it has explicitly been configured for it! And a NIC shouldn't treat any packets differently than other NICs do, unless the NIC has explicitly been configured so!

Furthermore, I would prefer that configurations for explicitly dropping certain types of packets is available through runtime APIs, e.g. RTE_FLOWS, or dedicated functions like rte_eth_promiscuous_enable/disable(). This patch doesn't support runtime detection of installed NICs performed by the application.

I am very surprised by this default behavior of a NIC. Please confirm that Source Pruning is at least disabled in Promiscuous mode?

-Morten


  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-21  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-19  9:04 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: disable source pruning Alvin Zhang
2021-10-19  9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Alvin Zhang
2021-10-20  1:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Alvin Zhang
2022-02-21  8:30     ` Jiang, YuX
2022-02-21  9:35       ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2022-12-26  9:03         ` Zhang, Ke1X
2022-12-26 10:26           ` Morten Brørup
2022-12-26 10:27           ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-09  2:20     ` [PATCH] " Ke Zhang
2023-01-09  7:40       ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-13 12:50       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-30  8:09       ` [PATCH v2] net/i40e: support enabling/disabling " Ke Zhang
2023-01-30  8:41         ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-30  8:58         ` David Marchand
2023-01-31  3:28           ` Zhang, Ke1X
2023-02-01 11:11             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-07  1:40               ` Zhang, Ke1X
2023-02-07  8:35                 ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86ECE@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=alvinx.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=junfeng.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=yux.jiang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.