All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Ophir Munk" <ophirmu@nvidia.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Devendra Singh Rawat" <dsinghrawat@marvell.com>,
	"Alok Prasad" <palok@marvell.com>
Cc: "Ophir Munk" <ophirmu@mellanox.com>,
	"Matan Azrad" <matan@nvidia.com>,
	"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Lior Margalit" <lmargalit@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3] lib: set/get max memzone segments
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 23:41:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D878E3@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230503072641.474600-1-ophirmu@nvidia.com>

> From: Ophir Munk [mailto:ophirmu@nvidia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2023 09.27
> 
> In current DPDK the RTE_MAX_MEMZONE definition is unconditionally hard
> coded as 2560.  For applications requiring different values of this
> parameter – it is more convenient to set the max value via an rte API -
> rather than changing the dpdk source code per application.  In many
> organizations, the possibility to compile a private DPDK library for a
> particular application does not exist at all.  With this option there is
> no need to recompile DPDK and it allows using an in-box packaged DPDK.
> An example usage for updating the RTE_MAX_MEMZONE would be of an
> application that uses the DPDK mempool library which is based on DPDK
> memzone library.  The application may need to create a number of
> steering tables, each of which will require its own mempool allocation.
> This commit is not about how to optimize the application usage of
> mempool nor about how to improve the mempool implementation based on
> memzone.  It is about how to make the max memzone definition - run-time
> customized.
> This commit adds an API which must be called before rte_eal_init():
> rte_memzone_max_set(int max).  If not called, the default memzone
> (RTE_MAX_MEMZONE) is used.  There is also an API to query the effective
> max memzone: rte_memzone_max_get().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@nvidia.com>

I retracted my objection to the RFC, but should also have added:

Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-03 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-19  8:36 [RFC] lib: set/get max memzone segments Ophir Munk
2023-04-19  8:48 ` Ophir Munk
2023-04-19 13:42 ` [EXT] " Devendra Singh Rawat
2023-04-24 21:07   ` Ophir Munk
2023-04-19 14:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-24 21:43   ` Ophir Munk
2023-04-19 14:51 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-20  7:43   ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-20 18:20     ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-21  8:34       ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-21 11:08         ` Morten Brørup
2023-04-21 14:57           ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-21 15:19             ` Morten Brørup
2023-04-25 16:38               ` Ophir Munk
2023-04-25 13:46   ` Ophir Munk
2023-04-25 16:40 ` [RFC V2] " Ophir Munk
2023-05-03  7:26   ` [PATCH V3] " Ophir Munk
2023-05-03 21:41     ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2023-05-25  6:47       ` Ophir Munk
2023-05-04  7:27     ` David Marchand
2023-05-25  6:35       ` Ophir Munk
2023-05-18 15:54     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-05-25  6:43       ` Ophir Munk
2023-05-24 22:25     ` [PATCH v4] " Ophir Munk
2023-05-25 14:53       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-05-30 11:37         ` Ophir Munk
2023-05-26  9:55       ` David Marchand
2023-05-28 12:09         ` [EXT] " Alok Prasad
2023-05-30 13:32       ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-05-31  7:56         ` Ophir Munk
2023-05-31  7:52       ` [PATCH V5] " Ophir Munk
2023-05-31  8:41         ` [PATCH V6] " Ophir Munk
2023-06-05  8:52           ` [PATCH V7] " Ophir Munk
2023-06-05 10:50             ` [PATCH V8] " Ophir Munk
2023-06-05 16:50               ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D878E3@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dsinghrawat@marvell.com \
    --cc=lmargalit@nvidia.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
    --cc=ophirmu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=palok@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.