From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] keys: play nicely with user namespaces Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:03:31 +0000 Message-ID: <9909.1229562211@redhat.com> References: <20081217235536.GA932@us.ibm.com> <20081212141707.GB9571@us.ibm.com> <20081211232323.GA8343@us.ibm.com> <3507.1229086294@redhat.com> <25987.1229097458@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081217235536.GA932-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Linux Containers , "Eric W. Biederman" List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > +++ CHOWN > FAILED Ah. My web pages have an old version of the testsuite; one that expects the keyctl chown op to fail with ENOTSUPP. Unfortunately, keyctl chown now works, so the test firstly finds chown failing to fail, and then because it expects it to fail, it doesn't chown the key back again, and thus the remaining tests fail. I'll dig the newer version of the tests out tomorrow. David