From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, ch@denx.de,
Joe Hung <joe_hung@ilitek.com>, Luca Hsu <luca_hsu@ilitek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Input: ili210x - export ili251x version details via sysfs
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 01:02:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <991280e5-fd54-75d5-d2f2-bb2673303881@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YS1HPKNZMP1XofM0@google.com>
On 8/30/21 11:01 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
[...]
>> @@ -351,6 +360,108 @@ static int ili251x_firmware_update_resolution(struct device *dev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static ssize_t ili251x_firmware_version_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> + struct ili210x *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + u8 fw[8];
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* Get firmware version */
>> + mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
>> + ret = priv->chip->read_reg(client, REG_FIRMWARE_VERSION,
>> + &fw, sizeof(fw));
>> + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
>
> Could we query firmware version and mode at probe time (and also later
> after firmware update attempt) so that we do not need to introduce
> locking against interrupt handler?
This is a threaded interrupt handler and I don't expect much lock
contention here.
The sysfs attribute readout would race with the interrupt handler and if
it wasn't for the firmware update support, we could very well cache all
those values. Except, the firmware update can change them all. Worse, if
the interrupt were to fire during an update, it could break that update,
and I want to prevent that from happening.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-30 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-27 21:12 [PATCH v2 1/3] Input: ili210x - use resolution from ili251x firmware Marek Vasut
2021-08-27 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Input: ili210x - export ili251x version details via sysfs Marek Vasut
2021-08-30 21:01 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-30 23:02 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2021-08-30 23:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-30 23:33 ` Marek Vasut
2021-08-30 23:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-27 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Input: ili210x - add ili251x firmware update support Marek Vasut
2021-08-30 21:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-30 23:27 ` Marek Vasut
2021-08-31 2:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-30 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Input: ili210x - use resolution from ili251x firmware Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-30 22:49 ` Marek Vasut
2021-08-30 23:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-30 23:31 ` Marek Vasut
2021-08-30 23:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-08-31 0:01 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=991280e5-fd54-75d5-d2f2-bb2673303881@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=ch@denx.de \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=joe_hung@ilitek.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca_hsu@ilitek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.