[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] spl: add support to booting with ATF

[Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>]

Hi


On 04/05/2017 04:25 PM, Dan Handley wrote:
> Hi
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Masahiro Yamada [mailto:yamada.masahiro at socionext.com]
>> Sent: 05 April 2017 06:36
>>
>> 2017-04-05 14:05 GMT+09:00 Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>:
>>> SPL is considered as BL2 in ATF terminology, it needs to load other
>>> parts of ATF binary like BL31, BL32, SCP-BL30, and BL33(U-Boot). And
>>> needs to
>>
>> SCP-BL30 ?
>>
>>
>> Dan,
>>
>> I see BL30 in old documents, but this was deprecated, right?
>>
> Yes, the BL30 terminology was deprecated in favour of SCP_BL2. See:
> https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/wiki/ARM-Trusted-Firmware-Image-Terminology#scp-ram-firmware-scp_bl2-previously-bl3-0

I get this concept from old document, I will remove it.
>
> However, given this is an optional image, it might be worth removing the reference altogether.
>
> Also, I notice this latest patch still uses bl31_params_t rather than the more recent bl_params_t.

I understand you prefer using IMAGE_V2 than IMAGE_V1, but I would like 
to support
IMAGE_V1 first, because for Rockchip rk3399, there is already binary 
release if bl31 which
is in IMAGE_V1 format like 
https://github.com/rockchip-linux/rkbin/tree/master/rk33.

Thanks,
- Kever
> Regards
>
> Dan.
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.