From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:15:01 +0100 Message-ID: <9925007.qJ5tT5KyCr@xps> References: <20171201185628.16261-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <15180448.zpY6jWigv2@xps> <20180130125722.GA15525@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Neil Horman Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA591B687 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:15:48 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20180130125722.GA15525@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 30/01/2018 16:54, Neil Horman: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman: > > > v5 Changes > > > * Clean ups suggested by Thomas > > > > There were a lot of new functions to tag when rebasing this v5. > > Rebased and applied, thanks. > > > Sorry, not clear what you mean by this. Are you saying that there were several > new experimental API's added recently that my initial set of tags missed? If > so, thanks for doing that. I will also be sending another patch set soon, to > reconcile API's that are documented as experimental but not listed in the > version map as such I meant that I have applied a lot of new experimental functions after you sent the v5. So I had to add the tag and CFLAGS for these new functions. Usual rebase work. About reconciling experimental functions and map, we should also consider upgrading some functions to non-experimental.