* Internal error: Oops from inet_frag_find, when inserting a IP frag into a rhashtable
@ 2021-05-18 19:22 sharathv
2021-05-19 11:20 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: sharathv @ 2021-05-18 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tgraf, herbert, netdev, linux-kernel, edumazet
Hi,
We are observing BUG_ON from the __get_vm_area_node when processing the
IP fragments in the context of NET_RX.
When the rehashing is in progress and an insertion is attempted, we may
end up doing a bucket_table_alloc, which results in BUG_ON if in
interrupt context.
Is it the case that the slow path code has to be executed only in the
context of rht_deferred_worker and not in any other context? OR are
these scenario's not anticipated and is a missed handling?
Please provide your suggestions on proceeding further with this issue.
static struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area_node(unsigned long size,
unsigned long align, unsigned long flags, unsigned long
start,
unsigned long end, int node, gfp_t gfp_mask, const void
*caller)
{
struct vmap_area *va;
struct vm_struct *area;
BUG_ON(in_interrupt()); --> Point of panic.
Panic stack:
784.185010: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754253]@2
Workqueue: events rht_deferred_worker
784.185020: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754262]@2
pstate: 00c00005 (nzcv daif +PAN +UAO)
784.185032: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754274]@2 pc
: __get_vm_area_node.llvm.17374696036975823682+0x1ac/0x1c8
784.185041: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754283]@2 lr
: __vmalloc_node_flags_caller+0xb4/0x170
784.185046: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754289]@2 sp
: ffffffc0104135a0
784.185052: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754295]@2
x29: ffffffc0104135a0 x28: ffffff82ccbcae50
784.185060: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754303]@2
x27: ffffff82eea8d3c0 x26: ffffff800ad044b0
784.185067: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754311]@2
x25: fffffffffffffffe x24: fffffffffffffff5
784.185075: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754318]@2
x23: 0000000000001000 x22: 0068000000000f13
784.185082: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754326]@2
x21: 00000000ffffffff x20: 0000000000008040
784.185090: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754333]@2
x19: 0000000000002b20 x18: ffffffc0103ad0c0
784.185097: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754340]@2
x17: 00000000e1ba4003 x16: d101500000cf012a
784.185104: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754347]@2
x15: 52d39bfeffbfebd0 x14: 3130393837363534
784.185111: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754355]@2
x13: 000000003b1ad624 x12: 0000000000000000
784.185118: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754362]@2
x11: 000000000000002e x10: 0000000000000600
784.185126: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754369]@2 x9
: 00000000002c022a x8 : 0000000000000101
784.185133: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754376]@2 x7
: f6da030000000000 x6 : ffffffe14adb3990
784.185140: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754384]@2 x5
: 0000000000002b20 x4 : fffffffebfff0000
784.185148: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754391]@2 x3
: ffffffc010000000 x2 : 0000000000000022
784.185155: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754398]@2 x1
: 0000000000000001 x0 : 0000000000009000
784.185164: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754406]@2
Call trace:
784.185172: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754415]@2
__get_vm_area_node.llvm.17374696036975823682+0x1ac/0x1c8
784.185179: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754422]@2
__vmalloc_node_flags_caller+0xb4/0x170
784.185189: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754432]@2
kvmalloc_node+0x40/0xa8
784.185199: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754442]@2
rhashtable_insert_rehash+0x84/0x264
784.185206: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754449]@2
rhashtable_try_insert+0x3fc/0x478
784.185213: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754455]@2
rhashtable_insert_slow+0x34/0x5c
784.185223: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754466]@2
__rhashtable_insert_fast+0x368/0x4f0
784.185234: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754476]@2
inet_frag_find+0x21c/0x2a8
784.185244: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754486]@2
nf_ct_frag6_gather+0x1f4/0x2a0
784.185252: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754494]@2
ipv6_defrag+0x58/0x7c
784.185262: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754504]@2
nf_hook_slow+0xa8/0x148
784.185272: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754514]@2
ipv6_rcv+0x80/0xe4
784.185282: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754524]@2
__netif_receive_skb+0x84/0x17c
784.185290: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754532]@2
process_backlog+0x15c/0x1b8
784.185297: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754539]@2
napi_poll+0x88/0x284
784.185304: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754547]@2
net_rx_action+0xbc/0x23c
784.185314: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754557]@2
__do_softirq+0x1e8/0x44c
784.185325: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754567]@2
__local_bh_enable_ip+0xb8/0xc8
784.185333: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754576]@2
local_bh_enable+0x1c/0x28
784.185340: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754583]@2
rhashtable_rehash_chain+0x12c/0x1ec
784.185347: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754590]@2
rht_deferred_worker+0x13c/0x200
784.185357: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754600]@2
process_one_work+0x2cc/0x568
784.185365: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754607]@2
worker_thread+0x28c/0x524
784.185373: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754616]@2
kthread+0x184/0x194
784.185381: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754623]@2
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Internal error: Oops from inet_frag_find, when inserting a IP frag into a rhashtable
2021-05-18 19:22 Internal error: Oops from inet_frag_find, when inserting a IP frag into a rhashtable sharathv
@ 2021-05-19 11:20 ` Herbert Xu
2021-05-26 14:36 ` sharathv
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2021-05-19 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sharathv; +Cc: tgraf, netdev, linux-kernel, edumazet
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:52:27AM +0530, sharathv@codeaurora.org wrote:
>
> 784.185172: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754415]@2
> __get_vm_area_node.llvm.17374696036975823682+0x1ac/0x1c8
> 784.185179: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754422]@2
> __vmalloc_node_flags_caller+0xb4/0x170
> 784.185189: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754432]@2
> kvmalloc_node+0x40/0xa8
> 784.185199: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754442]@2
> rhashtable_insert_rehash+0x84/0x264
Something very fishy is going on here.
The code path in rhashtable_insert_rehash cannot possibly trigger
vmalloc because it uses GFP_ATOMIC. Is this a pristine upstream
kernel or are there patches that may change things?
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Internal error: Oops from inet_frag_find, when inserting a IP frag into a rhashtable
2021-05-19 11:20 ` Herbert Xu
@ 2021-05-26 14:36 ` sharathv
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sharathv @ 2021-05-26 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: tgraf, netdev, linux-kernel, edumazet
On 2021-05-19 16:50, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:52:27AM +0530, sharathv@codeaurora.org
> wrote:
>>
>> 784.185172: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754415]@2
>> __get_vm_area_node.llvm.17374696036975823682+0x1ac/0x1c8
>> 784.185179: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754422]@2
>> __vmalloc_node_flags_caller+0xb4/0x170
>> 784.185189: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754432]@2
>> kvmalloc_node+0x40/0xa8
>> 784.185199: <2> (2)[71:kworker/2:1][20210408_17:01:54.754442]@2
>> rhashtable_insert_rehash+0x84/0x264
>
> Something very fishy is going on here.
>
> The code path in rhashtable_insert_rehash cannot possibly trigger
> vmalloc because it uses GFP_ATOMIC. Is this a pristine upstream
> kernel or are there patches that may change things?
>
> Cheers,
Thanks for the reply Herbert, we have got this crash reported from
external
folks and I am trying to get the answers for your questions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-26 14:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-18 19:22 Internal error: Oops from inet_frag_find, when inserting a IP frag into a rhashtable sharathv
2021-05-19 11:20 ` Herbert Xu
2021-05-26 14:36 ` sharathv
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.