From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E26C433E0 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E6EE64E4B for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:53:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3E6EE64E4B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59234 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD91h-0002k3-TD for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:53:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD8zr-0001h0-FU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:51:15 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:39786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD8zo-0006NA-CI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:51:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1613753471; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3PunZludcLgP5m/gX9y8nUqz9gZDpnAh5ulYcKaMt4o=; b=P9c+OtCdQ1ixBdrIDFuLPlXhcDhI3tSnjTMzsCY7F7hTgKBKgnQrjOHKQya42aJaqmwp18 /vlcjLwtOe3ObXCE1YW9wknU8AZ9hokSOEhv8M8t3WiiW9twBUdy/EKjz9vIAU5TlThznm POFW+toe8wihaFbQE388kUe3xHYEOyA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-570-er3U8Y0GP4qBTB74JCMcZg-1; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:51:07 -0500 X-MC-Unique: er3U8Y0GP4qBTB74JCMcZg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 810021E561; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth.remote.csb (ovpn-112-63.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.63]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A8B10016F6; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: who's using the ozlabs patchwork install for QEMU patches ? To: Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers , Alexey Kardashevskiy References: From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <99af17f9-10cf-7c9b-8222-2318b464f5b0@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:51:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=thuth@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 19/02/2021 17.26, Peter Maydell wrote: > Does anybody use the ozlabs patchwork install for QEMU patches, > either occasionally or on a regular basis ? > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/ > The admins for that system are trying to identify which of > the various projects are really using their patchwork instances, > so I figured I'd do a quick survey here. We don't use it > as an official project tool but it's certainly possible to > use it as an individual developer in one way or another. I think it might be used by some of the ppc hackers ... so CC:-ing to qemu-pcc ... Thomas