All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xifengfei <xi.fengfei@h3c.com>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: "linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kent.overstreet@gmail.com" <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: remove the redundant judgment on bi_size
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 06:23:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99cf62c8e3db44df8cc09ee5b327712c@h3c.com> (raw)

Thanks a lot. I understand the purpose.
So is the original judgment process too complicated?  Can we judge bi_size directly?  This will be more concise

@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static bool check_should_bypass(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio)
        add_sequential(task);
        i->sequential = 0;
 found:
-       if (i->sequential + bio->bi_iter.bi_size > i->sequential)
+       if (!bio->bi_iter.bi_size)
                i->sequential   += bio->bi_iter.bi_size;

        i->last                  = bio_end_sector(bio);

Thanks
Fengfei

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Coly Li [mailto:colyli@suse.de] 
发送时间: 2021年8月29日 15:50
收件人: xifengfei (RD) <xi.fengfei@h3c.com>
抄送: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kent.overstreet@gmail.com
主题: Re: [PATCH] bcache: remove the redundant judgment on bi_size

On 8/29/21 12:49 PM, Fengfei Xi wrote:
> The bi_size is unsigned int type data not less than 0, so we can 
> directly add bi_size without extra judgment
>
> Signed-off-by: Fengfei Xi <xi.fengfei@h3c.com>

NACK. The check is necessary to avoid redundant and unnecessary memory write.

Coly Li

> ---
>   drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 4 +---
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c 
> index 6d1de889b..2788eec3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> @@ -423,9 +423,7 @@ static bool check_should_bypass(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio)
>   	add_sequential(task);
>   	i->sequential = 0;
>   found:
> -	if (i->sequential + bio->bi_iter.bi_size > i->sequential)
> -		i->sequential	+= bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
> -
> +	i->sequential		+= bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>   	i->last			 = bio_end_sector(bio);
>   	i->jiffies		 = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(5000);
>   	task->sequential_io	 = i->sequential;


             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-30  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-30  6:23 Xifengfei [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-31  2:05 [PATCH] bcache: remove the redundant judgment on bi_size Xifengfei
2021-08-30  6:29 Xifengfei
2021-08-31  1:35 ` Coly Li
2021-08-29  4:49 Fengfei Xi
2021-08-29  7:49 ` Coly Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99cf62c8e3db44df8cc09ee5b327712c@h3c.com \
    --to=xi.fengfei@h3c.com \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.