From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: enable VF untag drop Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:51:08 +0000 Message-ID: <99df9cb9-cbad-d41a-7b99-2888e4f926cb@intel.com> References: <20170303015924.68986-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> <20170303015924.68986-2-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Qi Zhang , jingjing.wu@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4F8108A for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:51:11 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20170303015924.68986-2-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 3/3/2017 1:59 AM, Qi Zhang wrote: > Add a new private API to support the untag drop enable/disable > for specific VF. > > Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang > --- > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e.h | 18 +++++++++++++++ Shared library is giving build error because of API is missing in *version.map file > 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+) > <...> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e.h b/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e.h > index a0ad88c..895e2cc 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e.h > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e.h > @@ -332,4 +332,22 @@ int rte_pmd_i40e_get_vf_stats(uint8_t port, > int rte_pmd_i40e_reset_vf_stats(uint8_t port, > uint16_t vf_id); > > +/** > + * Enable/Disable VF untag drop > + * > + * @param port > + * The port identifier of the Ethernet device. > + * @param vf_id > + * VF on witch to enable/disable > + * @param on > + * Enable or Disable > + * @retura @return > + * - (0) if successful. > + * -(-ENODEVE) if *port* invalid > + * -(-EINVAL) if bad parameter. > + */ > +int rte_pmd_i40e_set_vf_vlan_untag_drop(uint8_t port, > + uint16_t vf_id, > + uint8_t on); As discussed previously, I believe it is good to keep following syntax in API: __, for this API it becomes: rte_pmd_i40e_vf_vlan_untag_drop_set(), and perhaps "set" can be removed? > + > #endif /* _PMD_I40E_H_ */ >