All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/5] Add specification exception tests
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 18:09:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99e7ce31-8723-8c30-c503-61eb35e216a3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211005103025.1998376-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>

On 05/10/2021 12.30, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 11:13:22AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 05/10/2021 11.09, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
>>> Test that specification exceptions cause the correct interruption code
>>> during both normal and transactional execution.
>>>
>>> The last three patches are cosmetic only and could be dropped.
>>>
>>> Unrelated: There should not be * in the file patterns in MAINTAINERS,
>>> should there?
>>
>> I think those could be dropped, indeed. Care to send a patch?
> 
> You mean the * patterns, not the cosmetic patches, correct?
> 
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Include subdirectories in file
>   patterns
> 
> The * pattern does not cover subdirectories, so get_maintainer.pl does
> not know who maintains e.g. lib/<arch>/asm/*.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   MAINTAINERS | 20 ++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 4fc01a5..15b5e1b 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ M: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>   S: Supported
>   L: kvm@vger.kernel.org
>   L: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> -F: arm/*
> -F: lib/arm/*
> -F: lib/arm64/*
> +F: arm/
> +F: lib/arm/
> +F: lib/arm64/
>   T: https://gitlab.com/rhdrjones/kvm-unit-tests.git
>   
>   POWERPC
> @@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ M: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>   S: Maintained
>   L: kvm@vger.kernel.org
>   L: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
> -F: powerpc/*
> -F: lib/powerpc/*
> -F: lib/ppc64/*
> +F: powerpc/
> +F: lib/powerpc/
> +F: lib/ppc64/
>   
>   S390X
>   M: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> @@ -92,13 +92,13 @@ R: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
>   R: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>   L: kvm@vger.kernel.org
>   L: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> -F: s390x/*
> -F: lib/s390x/*
> +F: s390x/
> +F: lib/s390x/
>   
>   X86
>   M: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>   S: Supported
>   L: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> -F: x86/*
> -F: lib/x86/*
> +F: x86/
> +F: lib/x86/
>   T: https://gitlab.com/bonzini/kvm-unit-tests.git
> 
> base-commit: fe26131eec769cef7ad7e2e1e4e192aa0bdb2bba
> 

Thanks, applied.

  Thomas


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-05 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20211005090921.1816373-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
2021-10-05  9:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/5] s390x: Add specification exception test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-10-05 11:14   ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/5] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/5] Add specification exception tests Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
     [not found]   ` <ef75d789-b613-e828-7d6d-2ab2b5e7618c@linux.ibm.com>
2021-10-05 13:32     ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/5] s390x: Add specification exception test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-10-05 14:51   ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-05 16:14     ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-10-05  9:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/5] s390x: Test specification exceptions during transaction Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-10-05  9:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/5] lib: Introduce report_pass and report_fail Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-10-05  9:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/5] Use report_fail(...) instead of report(0/false, ...) Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-10-05  9:09   ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-10-05 11:53   ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-05 11:53     ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-05 15:37   ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-05 15:37     ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-05  9:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/5] Use report_pass(...) instead of report(1/true, ...) Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-10-05 15:42   ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-07  6:50   ` Thomas Huth
     [not found] ` <2f5f7152-1f11-f462-de27-3d49f4588dfe@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20211005103025.1998376-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
2021-10-05 16:09     ` Thomas Huth [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99e7ce31-8723-8c30-c503-61eb35e216a3@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.