From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Durrant Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/viridian: Make logging less verbose Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:52:24 +0000 Message-ID: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD041C5CB@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net> References: <1407173867-10516-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> <1407173867-10516-3-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> <53E09E9602000078000294E0@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53E09E9602000078000294E0@mail.emea.novell.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: "Keir (Xen.org)" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com] > Sent: 05 August 2014 08:07 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir (Xen.org) > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/viridian: Make logging less verbose > > >>> On 04.08.14 at 19:37, wrote: > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian.c > > @@ -120,37 +120,27 @@ int cpuid_viridian_leaves(unsigned int leaf, > unsigned int *eax, > > > > static void dump_guest_os_id(const struct domain *d) > > { > > - gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "GUEST_OS_ID:\n"); > > - gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "\tvendor: %x\n", > > - d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.vendor); > > - gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "\tos: %x\n", > > - d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.os); > > - gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "\tmajor: %x\n", > > - d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.major); > > - gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "\tminor: %x\n", > > - d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.minor); > > - gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "\tsp: %x\n", > > - d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.service_pack); > > - gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "\tbuild: %x\n", > > - d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.build_number); > > + printk(XENLOG_G_INFO "GUEST_OS_ID: vendor: %x os: %x major: %x > minor: %x sp: %x build: %x\n", > > + d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.vendor, > > + d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.os, > > + d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.major, > > + d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.minor, > > + d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.service_pack, > > + d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields.build_number); > > So how will one now know which of the potentially many guests this > is about? > Damn. I meant to put in an explicit %d: and print the domid, but forgot. > Also for readability I think a local variable initialized to > &d->arch.hvm_domain.viridian.guest_os_id.fields would be quite > beneficial here. > Yes, you're probably right. Paul > Jan