From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Wu, Jingjing" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] app/testpmd: add isolated mode parameter Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 05:52:13 +0000 Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810DB5D34@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <0dca86aa1372d6ff09d0aff01d522c580e0e24ab.1495717153.git.vasilyf@mellanox.com> <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810DAC7A8@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <3515786.3Gc2XbLCYg@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Vasily Philipov , Adrien Mazarguil , =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=E9lio_Laranjeiro?= To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CF92BE1 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 07:52:27 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <3515786.3Gc2XbLCYg@xps> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > > > Should it block the app startup if isolated-mode setting fails? > > > > > > if isolated mode cannot be enabled on any port, that port cannot be > > > initialized and that causes testpmd to quit, at least it won't go > > > against the user's wishes > > > > If so, I prefer the isolated_mode to be port's argument but not global = one. > > How about to add a command to configure the isolate mode? >=20 > There is already a command to configure isolate mode per-port: > http://dpdk.org/patch/25320 > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.html#flow > -syntax >=20 > I think it does not make sense to replicate this per-port command in comm= and > line parameters. > All the other parameters are global: > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.html#testpmd- > command-line-options > The idea here is to have a global isolate mode with a general option. OK. Thanks Then I'm fine with it.