From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp65G-0005EU-Uq for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:08:07 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2011 15:03:42 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,319,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="35520970" Received: from orsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.49]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2011 15:03:41 -0700 Received: from orsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.226.128) by orsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.226.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:03:41 -0700 Received: from orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.207]) by orsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.128]) with mapi; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:03:41 -0700 From: "Kamble, Nitin A" To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:03:41 -0700 Thread-Topic: [OE-core] [PATCH 06/10] kernel, module-base.bbclass: fix KERNEL_LD & KERNEL_AR vars Thread-Index: AcxS8Jqa+ULSwxa+T6u981vPucXqkgAAYFUQ Message-ID: <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94DE85F4BE@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1312494624.3169.1.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> In-Reply-To: <1312494624.3169.1.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] kernel, module-base.bbclass: fix KERNEL_LD & KERNEL_AR vars X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:08:07 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > -----Original Message----- > From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Phil Blundell > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:50 PM > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 06/10] kernel, module-base.bbclass: fix > KERNEL_LD & KERNEL_AR vars >=20 > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kamble@intel.com wrote: > > From: Nitin A Kamble > > > > KERNEL_LD was using ${LD} in it's definition, which is not correct > for > > different ABIs such as x32 or i386 on x86_64 machine. > > > > Same with KERNEL_AR var. >=20 > Why is ar an issue? That doesn't have any unusual args, does it? >=20 > p. No special args for ar, but The change makes definition of KERNEL_AR consis= tent with other definitions like KERNEL_CC & KERNEL_LD. Nitin >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core