From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp6vl-0007vI-6p for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:02:21 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2011 15:57:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,320,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="35292964" Received: from orsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.211]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2011 15:57:56 -0700 Received: from orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.207]) by orsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.211]) with mapi; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:57:56 -0700 From: "Kamble, Nitin A" To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:57:56 -0700 Thread-Topic: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed support for glibc recipes Thread-Index: AcxS+OBWMZLN9ScsTtWQA+JYwRn4zQAALEZQ Message-ID: <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94DE85F584@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <03d062a7104f31d03893833485ec3836c07e8f90.1312469790.git.nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> <1312494646.3169.2.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94DE85F4C1@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> <1312495815.3169.9.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <9DA5872FEF993D41B7173F58FCF6BE94DE85F563@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed support for glibc recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:02:21 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > -----Original Message----- > From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Tom Rini > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:50 PM > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed > support for glibc recipes >=20 > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Kamble, Nitin A > wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org > >> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf > Of > >> Phil Blundell > >> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:10 PM > >> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed > >> support for glibc recipes > >> > >> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 15:04 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: > >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org > >> > > [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On > Behalf > >> Of > >> > > Phil Blundell > >> > > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:51 PM > >> > > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > >> > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the > needed > >> > > support for glibc recipes > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kamble@intel.com > wrote: > >> > > > From: Nitin A Kamble > >> > > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble > >> > > > >> > > This commit message is very terse. =A0Why is this change > necessary? > >> > > >> > Because meta-x32 layer has glibc, which needs these support files. > I > >> will update the commit message in the tree. > >> > >> Can't the tclibc-glibc file go in meta-x32 as well, then? > >> > > It can go in the meta-x32 layer, but I think better place for this > support file is in the meta layer. It would help avoid duplication of > the code in multiple layers. >=20 > Part of the answer here is that obsolete / etc things don't belong in > the core, but in other layers that need them. My read on things is > that we've removed glibc in favor of eglibc... With high demand I will move the glibc file in the meta-x32 layer. I was tr= ying to do what felt right at 1st, but I wasn't aware that eglibc is favore= d so much over glibc. >=20 > -- > Tom >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core