On 18 Jun 2021, at 2:15, Huang Ying wrote: > From: Dave Hansen > > Anonymous pages are kept on their own LRU(s). These lists could > theoretically always be scanned and maintained. But, without swap, > there is currently nothing the kernel can *do* with the results of a > scanned, sorted LRU for anonymous pages. > > A check for '!total_swap_pages' currently serves as a valid check as > to whether anonymous LRUs should be maintained. However, another > method will be added shortly: page demotion. > > Abstract out the 'total_swap_pages' checks into a helper, give it a > logically significant name, and check for the possibility of page > demotion. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen > Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" > Reviewed-by: Yang Shi > Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen > Cc: Michal Hocko > Cc: Wei Xu > Cc: David Rientjes > Cc: Dan Williams > Cc: David Hildenbrand > Cc: osalvador > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 7d5c7216a4b7..8654cec65522 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -2706,6 +2706,26 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, > } > } > > +/* > + * Anonymous LRU management is a waste if there is > + * ultimately no way to reclaim the memory. > + */ > +bool anon_should_be_aged(struct lruvec *lruvec) > +{ > + struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec); > + > + /* Aging the anon LRU is valuable if swap is present: */ > + if (total_swap_pages > 0) > + return true; > + > + /* Also valuable if anon pages can be demoted: */ > + if (next_demotion_node(pgdat->node_id) >= 0) != NUMA_NO_NODE might be better, even though we know NUMA_NO_NODE is currently set to -1. > + return true; > + > + /* No way to reclaim anon pages. Should not age anon LRUs: */ > + return false; > +} > + > static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) > { > unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS]; > @@ -2815,7 +2835,8 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) > * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to > * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio. > */ > - if (total_swap_pages && inactive_is_low(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON)) > + if (anon_should_be_aged(lruvec) && > + inactive_is_low(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON)) > shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, lruvec, > sc, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON); > } > @@ -3644,10 +3665,11 @@ static void age_active_anon(struct pglist_data *pgdat, > struct mem_cgroup *memcg; > struct lruvec *lruvec; > > - if (!total_swap_pages) > + lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(NULL, pgdat); > + > + if (!anon_should_be_aged(lruvec)) > return; > > - lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(NULL, pgdat); > if (!inactive_is_low(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON)) > return; > > -- > 2.30.2 — Best Regards, Yan, Zi