From: Shuah Khan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <email@example.com>
Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
Shuah Khan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests/kmod: increase the kmod timeout from 45 to 165
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:06:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw)
On 3/3/23 14:48, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 01:35:10PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 2/27/23 15:42, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 03:32:50PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>> On 2/6/23 16:43, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>>>>> The default sefltests timeout is 45 seconds. If you run the kmod
>>>>> selftests on your own with say:
>>>>> Then the default timeout won't be in effect.
>>>>> I've never ran kmod selftests using the generic make wrapper
>>>>> (./tools/testing/selftests/run_kselftest.sh -s) util now
>>>>> that I have support for it on kdevops . And with that the
>>>>> test is limitted to the default timeout which we quickly run
>>>>> into. Bump this up to what I see is required on 8GiB / 8 vcpu
>>>>> libvirt q35 guest as can be easily created now with kdevops.
>>>>> To run selftests with kdevops:
>>>>> make menuconfig # enable dedicated selftests and kmod test
>>>>> make bringup
>>>>> make linux
>>>>> make selftests-kmod
>>>>> This ends up taking about 280 seconds now, give or take add
>>>>> 50 seconds more more and we end up with 350. Document the
>>>>>  https://github.com/linux-kdevops/kdevops
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/kmod/settings | 4 ++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kmod/settings
>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/settings b/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/settings
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 000000000000..6fca0f1a4594
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kmod/settings
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
>>>>> +# measured from a manual run:
>>>>> +# time ./tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh
>>>>> +# Then add ~50 seconds more gracetime.
>>>> Adding timeouts like this for individual tests increases the overall kselftest
>>>> run-time. I am not in favor of adding timeouts.
>>>> We have to find a better way to do this.
>>> Well if folks don't have this the test will fail, and so a false
>>> positive. If the goal is to have a low time timeout for "do not run
>>> tests past this time and do not fail if we stopped the test" then
>>> that seems to be likely one way to go and each test may need to be
>>> modified to not fail fatally in case of a special signal.
>> We are finding more and more that timeout values are requiring
>> tweaks. I am in favor of coming up a way to exit the test with
>> a timeout condition.
> OK so do we use the existing timeout as a "optional, I don't want my
> test to take longer than this" or "if this test takes longer than
> this amount this is a fatal issue"?
It isn't a fatal issue. So I wouldn't call it one. I would add a
message saying test timed out.
One way to handle this is:
- Add a test run-time option and have user tune it as needed.
Make the timeout an option so users can set it based on their
> I ask because right now we can't override it even with an environment
> variable. If we had such support we can let test runners (like kdevops)
> use selftests with its own set of qualified / verified timeouts for the
> VMs it uses.
> For instance, Iw ant to soon start asking 0day to enable my kdevops
> 0-day tests for the subsystems I maintain, but I can't do that yet as
> the timeout is not correct.
This test isn't part of the default run, so day has to run this as a
special case and it would make prefect sense to provide a tunable
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-06 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-06 23:43 [PATCH 0/2] selftests: bump timeout for firmware and kmod Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-06 23:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests/kmod: increase the kmod timeout from 45 to 165 Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-27 22:32 ` Shuah Khan
2023-02-27 22:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-03 20:35 ` Shuah Khan
2023-03-03 21:48 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-06 16:06 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2023-03-08 20:29 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-06 23:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/firmware: increase timeout from 165 to 230 Luis Chamberlain
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.