From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3543BC433DB for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E09DB223E0 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:05:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E09DB223E0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.71704.128624 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2HrR-0007z7-AV; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:05:41 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 71704.128624; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:05:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2HrR-0007z0-6i; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:05:41 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 71704; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:05:40 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2HrQ-0007yt-0K for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:05:40 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2HrK-0006e2-OO; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:05:34 +0000 Received: from [54.239.6.186] (helo=a483e7b01a66.ant.amazon.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2HrK-0001YE-Dl; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:05:34 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject; bh=B1bc4piYFybsa0Y1dwlyxev7i8CQ4bsWS1AkeW5LKvw=; b=LjYX/bXvXCkfRLY+BoR/GzDEPu xWNCxWuIdM5k70p07x17G00HUqNF8EwZv6Wnckfo4syHnbD7yjiWjQFt2+TfmfW4AwSXzYGEPNNRL 8qFq66QMg2UiJRukYsQQfqHKrL+dADLBt2rdRuNhgiQFYo6BVSzHJKVoGEgatdZDZ4uQ=; Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: acpi: Hide UART address only if SPCR exists To: Elliott Mitchell , Masami Hiramatsu Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org, bertrand.marquis@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Volodymyr Babchuk , Andrew Cooper , George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , Jan Beulich , Wei Liu , Roger Pau Monn?? References: <160129689861.4486.15700361505030965554.stgit@localhost> From: Julien Grall Message-ID: <9a9618ba-1f93-7c7f-f181-22405e5ea6f9@xen.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:05:31 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 19/01/2021 07:25, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:41:39PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> With Julien's ACPI fix, I found my DeveloperBox ( >> https://www.96boards.org/product/developerbox/ ) still failed >> to boot bcause of SPCR issue. According to the UEFI EDK2 >> implementation, the SCPR table will not be made if user >> chooses graphical console instead of serial. >> In such case, we should ignore the SPCR missing error. > > You weren't the only person running into this. Since you didn't get > back sooner I ended up submitting a pretty similar patch (I kept the > printk() due to informational value). Right, a cut-down version of the patch submitted has been merged. @Masami, I believe all the ACPI patches for Arm went in. Would you mind to try the latest staging branch? > > 861f0c110976fa8879b7bf63d9478b6be83d4ab6 on master (switching to "main" > in the future?) There was a discussion about it a few months ago. The last input we were waiting on github to make the change and adopt the same name. Feel free to give a nudge on the thread [1]. Cheers, [1] <24307.31637.214096.240023@mariner.uk.xensource.com> -- Julien Grall