From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: [RFCv2 00/15] RFCv2: Consolidated userspace RDMA library repo Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:56:55 -0400 Message-ID: <9aaeb3e2-9283-9850-0dfa-d1ea150e7408@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <1471889618-1605-1-git-send-email-jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB07FB7A@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB07FBE1@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <20160913180342.GA6933@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160913180342.GA6933-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe , "Hefty, Sean" Cc: Doug Ledford , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Devesh Sharma , "Marciniszyn, Mike" , Moni Shoua , Steve Wise , "Nikolova, Tatyana E" , Vladimir Sokolovsky , Yishai Hadas List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 9/13/2016 2:03 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > opensm is not qualified since it rides on the other libraries. I'm not sure whether opensm should be in or out. However, I don't understand the not qualified part. It does seem to be similar to both srptools and ibacm which are all daemons and live on top of libibverbs and libibumad (ibacm has addition netlink socket support). What are the metrics for inclusion ? What other libraries are you referring to ? OpenSM lives on top of libibumad and two internal libraries (complib and a "vendor" library). -- Hal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html