From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDDBC433DF for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA6CC206DC for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=xen.org header.i=@xen.org header.b="xk4g9a9J" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DA6CC206DC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jgsol-0003h9-Q2; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:34:11 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jgsok-0003h0-Ti for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:34:10 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 3766eac2-a681-11ea-aebe-12813bfff9fa Received: from mail.xenproject.org (unknown [104.130.215.37]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 3766eac2-a681-11ea-aebe-12813bfff9fa; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:34:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NBXJUJsJTzOpO6WNXRcTt1YH0gFs7vUGy9SndxnqndI=; b=xk4g9a9JFWLEE7OpR1bK4mhWfH 1giPl+YO/Bca+Obo2Gc15s3n3+fVKWUmhjD1cR7VtI+Fe/1AuPYObPG3so4zleLoqEAX5FR+n5Gns CN9GDejQ9+oNMl9N4iEaXk+qT3f2M8zw6HPxXDsl7K3C+oit2BdQVeXezOo8QZo1ovtw=; Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jgsoj-0001Pi-Hv; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:34:09 +0000 Received: from [54.239.6.186] (helo=a483e7b01a66.ant.amazon.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jgsoj-0003G5-Au; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:34:09 +0000 Subject: Re: UEFI support in ARM DomUs To: Stefano Stabellini References: From: Julien Grall Message-ID: <9b4163cf-9cba-e094-cfff-594a3530f891@xen.org> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:34:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Xen-devel , Peng Fan , Roman Shaposhnik , Nataliya Korovkina , Oleksandr Andrushchenko Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Hi, On 04/06/2020 17:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jun 2020, Julien Grall wrote: >> On 04/06/2020 16:26, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >>> On 6/4/20 4:57 AM, Peng Fan wrote: >>>> Grall ; >>>>> Nataliya Korovkina >>>>> Subject: UEFI support in ARM DomUs >>>> We have made U-Boot run inside XEN DomU, but just only PV console part, >>>> not implement other frontend drivers currently. Would this help for your >>>> case if enable EFI in U-Boot? >>> >>> Well, we have a working PV block implementation on top of that on iMX8 >> >> That's a nice work and will be a good addition. However... >> >>> >>> platform, mostly ported from mini-os. Currently we are finalizing the work >> >> ... AFAICT mini-os is licensed using BSD-2 while U-boot is using GPLv2. So I >> would be careful with the licensing here. >> >> It might be better to consider to port Linux PV driver instead or rewrite them >> completely. > > Julien, I might be misunderstanding what you wrote. MiniOS is BSD-2 so > MiniOS code can be integrated into a GPLv2 project without issues > (becoming GPLv2.) So it should be OK to take MiniOS code and add it to > Uboot? Yes I did realized that afterwards. Sorry for the noise :(. Cheers, -- Julien Grall