From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0905EC433E7 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 03:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A1D221FC for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 03:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391107AbgJTD2e (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:28:34 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:40415 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729973AbgJTD2e (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:28:34 -0400 IronPort-SDR: nVn1STLFPQP8YmsAtV9r6St1T9H6VySMd3qyZ8954hdBZ9M3GaGKPD8SbmvbJLvnGKWANT5Otl SVMbJOsRme8w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9779"; a="184770534" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,396,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="184770534" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Oct 2020 20:28:33 -0700 IronPort-SDR: LQOOj/EAninqCcKSQlitVHFU/a8ztNYY3LQgvv9oy+/F6lJEkWB4uRLolp4Y+pMXFlej3mgLad MVKBXGTuoiww== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,396,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="532876595" Received: from xingzhen-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.238.4.68]) ([10.238.4.68]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Oct 2020 20:28:31 -0700 Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: Unreliable will-it-scale context_switch1 test on 0day bot To: Philip Li , Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Anton Blanchard , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel , lkp , 0day robot , Zhengjun Xing References: <104775100.27222.1603114052224.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20201019152410.GA14293@intel.com> From: Xing Zhengjun Message-ID: <9b8bb76e-5349-acff-117a-fb2b3192c4cb@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:28:30 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201019152410.GA14293@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/19/2020 11:24 PM, Philip Li wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:27:32AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I pointed out an issue with the will-it-scale context_switch1 test run by the 0day bot on >> October 7, 2020, and got no reply. > Thanks Mathieu for the feedback, we had added it to the TODO list but sorry for > not reply in time. > > Zhengjun, can you help follow up this mail thread? > I have replied in the origin mail. >> >> Until this issue is solved, the results of those tests are basically pure noise when run on >> SMT hardware: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1183082664.11002.1602082242482.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com/ >> >> Who is maintaining those tests and the 0day bot ? > will-it-scale itself is from community at https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale > and we will look for the support if we don't have quick solution. 0day bot basically wraps > the test and analyze the result to find which commit leads to change. > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mathieu >> >> -- >> Mathieu Desnoyers >> EfficiOS Inc. >> http://www.efficios.com >> _______________________________________________ >> LKP mailing list -- lkp@lists.01.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@lists.01.org > _______________________________________________ > LKP mailing list -- lkp@lists.01.org > To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@lists.01.org > -- Zhengjun Xing