From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B85C433DB for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 02:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E707B64DD3 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 02:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231172AbhA1Cuv (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:50:51 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:12037 "EHLO szxga05-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229494AbhA1Cuu (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:50:50 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DR4fV0jsKzMR49; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:48:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.110.154] (10.136.110.154) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:50:05 +0800 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] f2fs: compress: add compress_inode to cache compressed blocks From: Chao Yu To: Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu CC: , References: <160f2cf9-73ca-18cd-6ad0-2498821b8db6@huawei.com> <37ba41db-2589-e155-c416-d0c8832026cb@huawei.com> <8e88b1e2-0176-9487-b925-9c7a31a7e5cd@huawei.com> <20a1dbd3-808e-e62a-53f3-7f1e2a316b3c@kernel.org> <068da0d3-18c9-53f7-0f24-63b07e1af272@huawei.com> Message-ID: <9b982458-57e1-a04d-c5d4-f5ca775af1e7@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:50:05 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <068da0d3-18c9-53f7-0f24-63b07e1af272@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.136.110.154] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/1/22 10:17, Chao Yu wrote: >> No, it seems this is not the case. > Oops, could you please help to remove all below codes and do the test again > to check whether they are the buggy codes? as I doubt there is use-after-free > bug. Any test result? :) Thanks, From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D82C433DB for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 02:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E86A64DD0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 02:50:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4E86A64DD0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4xO8-0004io-3i; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 02:50:28 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4xO6-0004ie-Pk for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 02:50:26 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:References:CC:To:From:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QT/2Ro20jZBkjgZNJFb9iHxV+HdXYUPk41iN89mwV6Q=; b=DMAUV9QPUAa8arZhpLLHJpUHcC HTHQFBAhiNwDwvAgK0H2rsQmyl51NwfGGeWhcDOlgVnZc3sXsWMmxaCmPyYPB6wAHgwJ4xXWR4aDk I9G3j5OwRXf4OAr9VVGGmCXW2sh92FKHEXwoeCOGoWwnIWVZa3wAHDQ1j2XOV70F9iks=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:References:CC:To:From:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QT/2Ro20jZBkjgZNJFb9iHxV+HdXYUPk41iN89mwV6Q=; b=A62zM6tHKDgXGs+v8Fgr5qr614 4D6zpQzbKbndv95vKYCHNpbAlXQrqUNyeqqcBvstBohaD8afuAwEh1dtpjiz6P4/QO48Sb4+Ll/9+ VJH4M9Zn5HH00LN7Q6FXG+4B+3cU+lXxb9UFTNWYqSs5n/Tg/X15eNivPCXwQwMMTPIY=; Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) id 1l4xNy-0002gh-JN for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 02:50:26 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DR4fV0jsKzMR49; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:48:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.110.154] (10.136.110.154) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:50:05 +0800 From: Chao Yu To: Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu References: <160f2cf9-73ca-18cd-6ad0-2498821b8db6@huawei.com> <37ba41db-2589-e155-c416-d0c8832026cb@huawei.com> <8e88b1e2-0176-9487-b925-9c7a31a7e5cd@huawei.com> <20a1dbd3-808e-e62a-53f3-7f1e2a316b3c@kernel.org> <068da0d3-18c9-53f7-0f24-63b07e1af272@huawei.com> Message-ID: <9b982458-57e1-a04d-c5d4-f5ca775af1e7@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:50:05 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <068da0d3-18c9-53f7-0f24-63b07e1af272@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.136.110.154] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1l4xNy-0002gh-JN Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] f2fs: compress: add compress_inode to cache compressed blocks X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2021/1/22 10:17, Chao Yu wrote: >> No, it seems this is not the case. > Oops, could you please help to remove all below codes and do the test again > to check whether they are the buggy codes? as I doubt there is use-after-free > bug. Any test result? :) Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel