From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,PDS_BAD_THREAD_QP_64,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADEEC433ED for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:12:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7288E611ED for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:12:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230290AbhEUNNX (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 09:13:23 -0400 Received: from mx01-sz.bfs.de ([194.94.69.67]:19526 "EHLO mx01-sz.bfs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229915AbhEUNNU (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 09:13:20 -0400 Received: from SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern (exchange-sz.bfs.de [10.129.90.31]) by mx01-sz.bfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F0FE2072A; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:11:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bfs.de; s=dkim201901; t=1621602716; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PYadnBMToPq5Vvcp5pynGqF9vcF3LZ0FVHMEPttWrpQ=; b=STG3bkbQ3JM+OvDY3elbwAn15638fI7NSBgtla2DvhrEMfpSH78G1h1NX4nKci6Gypfphd k06ANbCy6LkDd8gTGHzJM7J/rRWOzd8vLDg7W3S3Rm1WGwYmgesTD8dclXZ3N5MHhNFtv0 HPcdboJ8WDajFCJq6Ks8wEDmwv0Hxs7tiI6TulNdAr92JRftEGk845js1Ace4Gv9E7KI9J qZ89sGYvEv2IkKqNkMbWokhC8o1rFW9yahzRP6byQDxxMte4uWsrEur1F2nET8NSSLiQJL 0xCDvDSiPPeAs1Z0SL+d8nnKLxlciT1rQsv3MAC22+RxH6lin785oR74xGaibw== Received: from SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern (10.129.90.31) by SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern (10.129.90.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2242.4; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:11:55 +0200 Received: from SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern ([fe80::7d2d:f9cb:2761:d24a]) by SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern ([fe80::7d2d:f9cb:2761:d24a%13]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.008; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:11:55 +0200 From: Walter Harms To: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" CC: "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" , "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Subject: AW: Re: Thread-Topic: Re: Thread-Index: AQHXTPMWVIcs2d4EfEKcaQoC4sfWeqrtpqiAgAA6BXw= Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 13:11:55 +0000 Message-ID: <9baa6f3ac0dd45b4b75a11044dd0f0ed@bfs.de> References: <60a57e3a.lbqA81rLGmtH2qoy%Radisson97@gmx.de>,<6d2849cd-d8af-0539-e579-3201daed6ab1@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6d2849cd-d8af-0539-e579-3201daed6ab1@gmail.com> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.137.16.40] x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-14.0.0.3080-8.6.1012-26172.000 x-tm-as-result: No-10--5.221600-5.000000 x-tmase-matchedrid: GV9cQvR5CLjRubRCcrbc5grcxrzwsv5u3dCmvEa6IiGoLZarzrrPmYVH 2zcrc5+5Y9IIZbKo3F/8OLoEItmIBrfBrkBZSdWA9u1rQ4BgXPIs+CgjlNydnJQvlZyyL67hN4I xix1zvwXnHqJEtsM2g7xFpZGWIKcrzECxVOnBRA4eTAX99VElYA8JAnaMw0RV/q/20XcvFJUhlG 9iTcYtak/ZxgG+lRG1XzoVjw1xuYkzPQQUbmWdb6oXHZz/dXlxK/YFZTiDf+otferJ/d7Ab9PLn r6G+Iy7JUCnmotb9KhGaC1P7W9BbPvPDLccHn7ijrVn4cme+w74qCLIu0mtIEukIs3g1HjeoeER vOjvHV3ixW+lK0/v4CtMgircbnS/G3Jt29YAwfCrm7DrUlmNkF+24nCsUSFNBLPx9cDMrKbdB/C xWTRRu92KvEVWmYr1EefVZ2XkFRmSCIk8UKH0fFpc/OZBASv1Le/NjhQo6eBsFqpgs46IiQ== x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No x-tmase-result: 10--5.221600-5.000000 x-tmase-version: SMEX-14.0.0.3080-8.6.1012-26172.000 x-tm-snts-smtp: 32C8D11BFC3E74E5226A1D3EFD2247E122670967FC6AA8C49F5A3F3BBE32D69D2000:9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: mx01-sz.bfs.de; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-16.18 / 7.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-1.18)[89.03%]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[bfs.de:s=dkim201901]; WHITELIST_LOCAL_IP(-15.00)[10.129.90.31]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[vger.kernel.org,gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org I will not argue that the function is deprecated. NTL i added the gamma_r function that are missing and changed the wording for the description. I think it is better than in lgamma especially for signgam. I noticed that it should be more obvious. re, wh ________________________________________ Von: Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Mai 2021 13:04 An: Radisson97@gmx.de Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org; Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) Betreff: Re: WARNUNG: Diese E-Mail kam von au=DFerhalb der Organisation. Klicken Sie nic= ht auf Links oder =F6ffnen Sie keine Anh=E4nge, es sei denn, Sie kennen den= /die Absender*in und wissen, dass der Inhalt sicher ist. Hi Walter, On 5/19/21 11:08 PM, Radisson97@gmx.de wrote: > From 765db7b7714514780b4e613c6d09d2ff454b1ef8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Harms > Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 22:25:08 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] gamma.3:Add reentrant functions gamma_r > > Add three variants of gamma_r and explain > the use of the second argument sig > > Signed-off-by: Harms I just read the manual page about gamma, and those functions/macros are deprecated (use either lgamma or tgamma instead). As far as I can read, those alternative functions have all the functionality one can need, so I guess there's zero reasons to use gamma at all, which is a misleading alias for lgamma. I think I won't patch that page at all. The glibc source code itself has a comment saying that gamma macros are obsolete: [ #if defined __USE_MISC || (defined __USE_XOPEN && !defined __USE_XOPEN2K) # if !__MATH_DECLARING_FLOATN /* Obsolete alias for `lgamma'. */ __MATHCALL (gamma,, (_Mdouble_)); # endif #endif ] Thanks, Alex -- Alejandro Colomar Linux man-pages comaintainer; https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Senior SW Engineer; http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/