From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ba_f Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 15:56:06 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot version issue In-Reply-To: <20150929161543.8D8C0380905@gemini.denx.de> References: <5c515fb3b2f956768d10d2e2c2e9402e@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> <20150924055526.0F0B1380905@gemini.denx.de> <2e2178cf246f80c4f9098dce357e5528@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> <20150929161543.8D8C0380905@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <9bdc7ea10b3133177ed8106a8df76fc9@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello, i have an issue with different U-Boot versions, and i have no clue what's the problem. Maybe someone's got an idea? Working on Xilinx' ARM Platform i use U-Boot version u-boot-xlnx-xilinx-v14.6.01, and it's all good with that one and even lower versions. But, using u-boot-xlnx-xilinx-v14.7 or higher results in serious CPU errors: uboot> fatload mmc 0 0x00ffffc0 bootstrap.uimage reading bootstrap.uimage 6139968 bytes read in 528 ms (11.1 MiB/s) uboot> go 0x01000000 ## Starting application at 0x01000000 ... undefined instruction pc : [<01000004>] lr : [<3ff74bc0>] sp : 3fb51e08 ip : 00002802 fp : 00000000 r10: 3fb572d8 r9 : 00000002 r8 : 3fb51f40 r7 : 3ffaff50 r6 : 01000000 r5 : 3fb572dc r4 : 00000002 r3 : 01000000 r2 : 3fb572dc r1 : 3fb572dc r0 : 00000001 Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs off Mode SVC_32 Resetting CPU ... I checked autoconf.mk of both version, but none uses Thumb mode. I already posted this in a similar context. In that thread i thought the different platform was the reason for failure. But now i'm convinced it is the U-Boot version making trouble. The platform in the other thread uses a new xilinx U-boot. http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-September/228940.html Now i use the same platform and the same uimage but another U-Boot. Unfortunately, the DIFF between u-boot-xlnx-xilinx-v14.6 and u-boot-xlnx-xilinx-v14.7 is 60'000 lines... Thank u & have nice day, ba_f