From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=eajames@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44QnSQ3k4MzDqVQ for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 02:21:42 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2MFEK2D096015 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:21:40 -0400 Received: from e13.ny.us.ibm.com (e13.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.203]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rd19638db-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:21:39 -0400 Received: from localhost by e13.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:21:35 -0000 Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.29) by e13.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.200) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:21:31 -0000 Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.107]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x2MFLXba19005652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:21:33 GMT Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE8312405C; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:21:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E36124054; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:21:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.85.226.87] (unknown [9.85.226.87]) by b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:21:32 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: Does obmc-ikvm work with bmcweb? To: Lei YU , Jae Hyun Yoo Cc: xiuzhi <1450335857@qq.com>, openbmc , ed , Eddie James , Thaju References: <2d44c252-94b6-6441-d3e8-a8200d89aaa5@linux.intel.com> <77cb1f2b-96c5-bd14-eab7-0da527343ce1@linux.intel.com> From: Eddie James Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:21:32 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19032215-0064-0000-0000-000003BEB3FA X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010795; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000282; SDB=6.01178074; UDB=6.00616327; IPR=6.00958772; MB=3.00026111; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-03-22 15:21:34 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19032215-0065-0000-0000-00003CCDDA19 Message-Id: <9c0500f5-fb43-660a-6db6-71cf919ce3ae@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-03-22_08:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903220112 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:21:43 -0000 On 3/21/19 10:34 PM, Lei YU wrote: >> Are you using a web browser from Windows OS? It seems that there is an >> issue of Windows websockify/novnc. Use a browser from OS other than >> Windows til the issue is resolved. > It's Ubuntu 18.04's Firefox and Chrome. > >> Did you test it using Tight VNC viewer after enabling external >> connection? The reason why I suggested that is to identify whether >> this issue comes from KVM web proxy or from KVM server. > Yes, TightVNC behaves the same as the KVM in browser. > >> Need more information of your test environment. >> Server platform: >> BMC SoC: >> Host OS: > Server platform: OpenPOWER Romulus > BMC SoC: AST2500 with OpenBMC master + patches needed for KVM > Host OS: Ubuntu 18.04 server > > There is an update from my testing: > 1. If the host is in Peitiboot (this is an OpenPOWER's thing), or in OS > without X, KVM sometimes works, sometimes does not work, as the log shown > above; I have seen this too; I think it's a VGA or VGA driver problem more than KVM. Not sure we will be able to find a fix. Thanks, Eddie > 2. If the host is in OS with X (e.g. lightdm), then KVM always works well. >