From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43zGQF2lCfzDqL4 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:43:17 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=ozlabs.org header.i=@ozlabs.org header.b="ps8Nmka3"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43zGQC6sxrz9s4Z; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:43:15 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1549960996; bh=WznQUvUL1Lq2Ur6WRA4xd59OHfNBmpzCoKRu7yCfhKg=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ps8Nmka3O1TukyWbDyWZqtKy1BDItUX8j/WDJQusKc0R2Oj+abtRf7du6su4hpx4Q JPLmk4zoJJansss6VKp4iwolq12+oJvWOZJGcvYNABoS3JZnhWKksKkbh1/hxnHcn4 2rDFLwZOwKx4bc0ahyNe1FGs/B2aZuC0RZzK+C/ZskbRAK+srcS8vQGBJqtve2xbJ0 TBWK/0VrMfirJWjto/jvddSw3KU7kX32rOH+VUXJjOtP/MG0+66/jbc/p/HNTYrKHe ufcWxUjsh8Xp0tpeEDmG2Osf3bGgK9oKq/zHuHhq4L2wlr+N4l3/nAnNwhW8RwXMY8 bzLW4iKCJGZcQ== Message-ID: <9c1410a1255d49735b7a9879750557bc92acaa47.camel@ozlabs.org> Subject: Re: Initial MCTP design proposal From: Jeremy Kerr To: Brad Bishop Cc: Emily Shaffer , David Thompson , openbmc , Supreeth Venkatesh , "Naidoo, Nilan" , Dong Wei Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:43:14 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20190211185736.dafbfc74n76r33pu@thinkpad.dyn.fuzziesquirrel.com> References: <20190207155131.gzntyqoflqfw5vld@thinkpad> <2159944d88eadddab4e7dfa5b50c85a4fc0ca234.camel@ozlabs.org> <20190211185736.dafbfc74n76r33pu@thinkpad.dyn.fuzziesquirrel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:43:18 -0000 Hi Brad, > > If we go ahead with the MCTP designs, and want to use this, I'd > > propose > > moving it from my personal github repo into /openbmc/ (after > > suitable > > updates to get it into OpenBMC standards, of course). Patches > > welcome! > > There was some interest in performing a formal code review on Gerrit > of > what you have written thus far (or intend to distribute). I'm okay with that, but I expect there to be a lot of churn while we work out the prototypes, which might make the formal reviews a bit pointless (if we end up throwing out the code that gets review). For example, we don't yet have a solid demonstration that the interfaces are fit for what we need. That'll shake out as part of the prototyping work that I'm doing now, but there may be changes needed between now and then. > To that end I could create an initial empty repository in the openbmc > namespace and you could push your tree there for review, when you are > ready. How does that sound? Yep, I'd be happy to do this when we decide on a good time to do the reviews. Cheers, Jeremy