Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Use DCN30 watermark calc for DCN301

[Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>]

On 2021-08-13 3:21 p.m., Liu, Zhan wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only]
> 
> [AMD Official Use Only]
> 
> [why]
> dcn301_calculate_wm_and_dl() causes flickering when external monitor is
> connected.
> 
> This issue has been fixed before by commit 0e4c0ae59d7e
> ("drm/amdgpu/display: drop dcn301_calculate_wm_and_dl for now"), however
> part of the fix was gone after commit 2cbcb78c9ee5 ("Merge tag
> 'amd-drm-next-5.13-2021-03-23' of
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fagd5f%2Flinux&data=04%7C01%7Csunpeng.li%40amd.com%7C5f101c8bf2594f79890508d95e8f8f98%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637644792952782170%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VDcz5SuZ0guBGRKKOlOWdWI%2FDLuIIwYAIs%2F8geu4JLU%3D&reserved=0 into drm-next").
> 
> [how]
> Use dcn30_calculate_wm_and_dlg() instead as in the original fix.
> 
> Fixes: 2cbcb78c9ee5 ("Merge tag 'amd-drm-next-5.13-2021-03-23' of https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fagd5f%2Flinux&data=04%7C01%7Csunpeng.li%40amd.com%7C5f101c8bf2594f79890508d95e8f8f98%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637644792952782170%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VDcz5SuZ0guBGRKKOlOWdWI%2FDLuIIwYAIs%2F8geu4JLU%3D&reserved=0 into drm-next")
> Signed-off-by: Nikola Cornij mailto:nikola.cornij@amd.com
> ---
>   .../amd/display/dc/dcn301/dcn301_resource.c   | 96 +------------------
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 95 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn301/dcn301_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn301/dcn301_resource.c
> index 9776d1737818..912285fdce18 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn301/dcn301_resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn301/dcn301_resource.c
> @@ -1622,106 +1622,12 @@ static void dcn301_update_bw_bounding_box(struct dc *dc, struct clk_bw_params *b
>          dml_init_instance(&dc->dml, &dcn3_01_soc, &dcn3_01_ip, DML_PROJECT_DCN30);
>   }
> 
> -static void calculate_wm_set_for_vlevel(
> -               int vlevel,
> -               struct wm_range_table_entry *table_entry,
> -               struct dcn_watermarks *wm_set,
> -               struct display_mode_lib *dml,
> -               display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes,
> -               int pipe_cnt)
> -{
> -       double dram_clock_change_latency_cached = dml->soc.dram_clock_change_latency_us;
> -
> -       ASSERT(vlevel < dml->soc.num_states);
> -       /* only pipe 0 is read for voltage and dcf/soc clocks */
> -       pipes[0].clks_cfg.voltage = vlevel;
> -       pipes[0].clks_cfg.dcfclk_mhz = dml->soc.clock_limits[vlevel].dcfclk_mhz;
> -       pipes[0].clks_cfg.socclk_mhz = dml->soc.clock_limits[vlevel].socclk_mhz;
> -
> -       dml->soc.dram_clock_change_latency_us = table_entry->pstate_latency_us;
> -       dml->soc.sr_exit_time_us = table_entry->sr_exit_time_us;
> -       dml->soc.sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us = table_entry->sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us;
> -
> -       wm_set->urgent_ns = get_wm_urgent(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> -       wm_set->cstate_pstate.cstate_enter_plus_exit_ns = get_wm_stutter_enter_exit(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> -       wm_set->cstate_pstate.cstate_exit_ns = get_wm_stutter_exit(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> -       wm_set->cstate_pstate.pstate_change_ns = get_wm_dram_clock_change(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> -       wm_set->pte_meta_urgent_ns = get_wm_memory_trip(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> -       wm_set->frac_urg_bw_nom = get_fraction_of_urgent_bandwidth(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> -       wm_set->frac_urg_bw_flip = get_fraction_of_urgent_bandwidth_imm_flip(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> -       wm_set->urgent_latency_ns = get_urgent_latency(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> -       dml->soc.dram_clock_change_latency_us = dram_clock_change_latency_cached;
> -
> -}
> -
> -static void dcn301_calculate_wm_and_dlg(
> -               struct dc *dc, struct dc_state *context,
> -               display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes,
> -               int pipe_cnt,
> -               int vlevel_req)
> -{
> -       int i, pipe_idx;
> -       int vlevel, vlevel_max;
> -       struct wm_range_table_entry *table_entry;
> -       struct clk_bw_params *bw_params = dc->clk_mgr->bw_params;
> -
> -       ASSERT(bw_params);
> -
> -       vlevel_max = bw_params->clk_table.num_entries - 1;
> -
> -       /* WM Set D */
> -       table_entry = &bw_params->wm_table.entries[WM_D];
> -       if (table_entry->wm_type == WM_TYPE_RETRAINING)
> -               vlevel = 0;
> -       else
> -               vlevel = vlevel_max;
> -       calculate_wm_set_for_vlevel(vlevel, table_entry, &context->bw_ctx.bw.dcn.watermarks.d,
> -                                               &context->bw_ctx.dml, pipes, pipe_cnt);
> -       /* WM Set C */
> -       table_entry = &bw_params->wm_table.entries[WM_C];
> -       vlevel = min(max(vlevel_req, 2), vlevel_max);
> -       calculate_wm_set_for_vlevel(vlevel, table_entry, &context->bw_ctx.bw.dcn.watermarks.c,
> -                                               &context->bw_ctx.dml, pipes, pipe_cnt);
> -       /* WM Set B */
> -       table_entry = &bw_params->wm_table.entries[WM_B];
> -       vlevel = min(max(vlevel_req, 1), vlevel_max);
> -       calculate_wm_set_for_vlevel(vlevel, table_entry, &context->bw_ctx.bw.dcn.watermarks.b,
> -                                               &context->bw_ctx.dml, pipes, pipe_cnt);
> -
> -       /* WM Set A */
> -       table_entry = &bw_params->wm_table.entries[WM_A];
> -       vlevel = min(vlevel_req, vlevel_max);
> -       calculate_wm_set_for_vlevel(vlevel, table_entry, &context->bw_ctx.bw.dcn.watermarks.a,
> -                                               &context->bw_ctx.dml, pipes, pipe_cnt);
> -
> -       for (i = 0, pipe_idx = 0; i < dc->res_pool->pipe_count; i++) {
> -               if (!context->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[i].stream)
> -                       continue;
> -
> -               pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dispclk_mhz = get_dispclk_calculated(&context->bw_ctx.dml, pipes, pipe_cnt);
> -               pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dppclk_mhz = get_dppclk_calculated(&context->bw_ctx.dml, pipes, pipe_cnt, pipe_idx);
> -
> -               if (dc->config.forced_clocks) {
> -                       pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dispclk_mhz = context->bw_ctx.dml.soc.clock_limits[0].dispclk_mhz;
> -                       pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dppclk_mhz = context->bw_ctx.dml.soc.clock_limits[0].dppclk_mhz;
> -               }
> -               if (dc->debug.min_disp_clk_khz > pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dispclk_mhz * 1000)
> -                       pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dispclk_mhz = dc->debug.min_disp_clk_khz / 1000.0;
> -               if (dc->debug.min_dpp_clk_khz > pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dppclk_mhz * 1000)
> -                       pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dppclk_mhz = dc->debug.min_dpp_clk_khz / 1000.0;
> -
> -               pipe_idx++;
> -       }
> -
> -       dcn20_calculate_dlg_params(dc, context, pipes, pipe_cnt, vlevel);
> -}
> -
>   static struct resource_funcs dcn301_res_pool_funcs = {
>          .destroy = dcn301_destroy_resource_pool,
>          .link_enc_create = dcn301_link_encoder_create,
>          .panel_cntl_create = dcn301_panel_cntl_create,
>          .validate_bandwidth = dcn30_validate_bandwidth,
> -       .calculate_wm_and_dlg = dcn301_calculate_wm_and_dlg,
> +       .calculate_wm_and_dlg = dcn30_calculate_wm_and_dlg,

Hi Zhan,

Using dcn30_calculate_wm_and_dlg smells fishy, IIRC watermark
calculations for DPUG and APU are very different. It's likely that
you're now picking up corrupted values form the wm_table.

Take a look at how struct wm_table is populated in vg_clk_mgr.c v.s.
dcn30_clk_mgr.c. For APU, wm_table.entries are populated, whereas for
DGPU, wm_table.nv_entries are populated. .entries and .nv_entries are
under a union, with very different struct definitions.

Have you taken a look at whether the pstate latency and sr enter/exit
latency values being used after your change are sensible? It could be
that you simply needed to raise these watermarks.

Thanks,
Leo

>          .update_soc_for_wm_a = dcn30_update_soc_for_wm_a,
>          .populate_dml_pipes = dcn30_populate_dml_pipes_from_context,
>          .acquire_idle_pipe_for_layer = dcn20_acquire_idle_pipe_for_layer,
> --
> 2.31.1
>