From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] net/mlx5: use port sibling iterators Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 12:33:44 +0100 Message-ID: <9c54c653-5d4c-4d81-b468-4e67a50cde9a@intel.com> References: <20181130002716.27325-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20190401022700.1570-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20190401022700.1570-4-thomas@monjalon.net> <70a875eb-661d-28db-48fa-ed59e8ad80e7@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Shahaf Shuler , Thomas Monjalon , "gaetan.rivet@6wind.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" To: Yongseok Koh Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299941B1FF for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 13:33:47 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 4/3/2019 7:07 PM, Yongseok Koh wrote: > >> On Apr 3, 2019, at 7:19 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> >> On 4/1/2019 3:26 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> Iterating over siblings was done with RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV() >>> which skips the owned ports. >>> The new iterators RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV_SIBLING() >>> and RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV_OF() are more appropriate and more correct. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon >> >> Hi Shahaf, Yongseok, >> >> Any comment on this patch? > > Sorry for late reply. > I know it has been merged but it looks okay to me. Thanks, I am appending explicit ack to the patch: Acked-by: Yongseok Koh