From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBF3C43603 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35D3520675 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="CwIQlee6" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 35D3520675 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:39788 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icVlF-0002P1-12 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:36:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icVk4-0001cv-Ce for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:35:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icVk3-0003wF-9y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:35:00 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:32321 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icVk3-0003vs-4k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:34:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1575470098; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9gBFpk/Jueu8hAjeG3YYqr91IpCtswdfWXSraQxrhF8=; b=CwIQlee6jODqOX6w2kaSJqeHTl4rvSyBSeWxHnPleZOgt1h8dlxWvHAknPU/ogrKrFsgPX bnp6h2FlNs0FXUnwCydo4QYyT9cJtRaDKh3nsEoaDlor+OHKoY0GoHLUBF4lH5h925Mic3 eucdFEPh7kV1jPvfSauEddAiqOBZj/I= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-293-aI-K4SgSPwiPexezAROnYg-1; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:34:55 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D30C210509A1; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.3.116.171] (ovpn-116-171.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.171]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4BEF19C68; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live? To: Markus Armbruster , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= References: <20191125185021.GB3767@work-vm> <20191126102600.GG556568@redhat.com> <20191126121416.GE2928@work-vm> <87k17ekhs9.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20191203105341.GB3078@work-vm> <20191203111949.GB267814@redhat.com> <87o8wofsda.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Message-ID: <9c5bed24-d7bf-ca77-dd1e-a1bd8af3f8fd@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:34:44 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87o8wofsda.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-MC-Unique: aI-K4SgSPwiPexezAROnYg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.81 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , qemu-block@nongnu.org, mszeredi@redhat.com, Jason Wang , QEMU Developers , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Gerd Hoffmann , Stefan Hajnoczi , =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= , Max Reitz , vgoyal@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 12/4/19 1:43 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> +- qemu-img >> | +- qemu-img.c > > Perhaps this one can all go into existing block/, similar to how > pr-manager-helper.c is in scsi/, and virtfs-proxy-helper.c is in fsdev/. > Up to the block maintainers, of course. > >> +- qemu-nbd >> | +- qemu-nbd.c > > block/ or nbd/? I'd lean towards nbd/, but am open to opinions from other block maintainers. Kevin's plan to add a generic block utility that includes the functionality of qemu-nbd may also matter (where block/ starts to sound better). > >> +- qemu-io >> | +- qemu-io.c >> | +- qemu-io-cmds.c > > block/? > qemu-img and qemu-io in block/ sound reasonable to me. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org