On 2/19/19 3:05 PM, Changqing Li wrote:


On 2/14/19 7:19 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 13:10 +0800, changqing.li@windriver.com wrote:
From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>

    The SDK was unable to find the C++ header pieces correctly since
it's
    using a generic compiler, not one specifically targeting the
multilib
    vendor prefix and default tune.  This adds the right mapping to
ensure
    SDKs work as expected. And fix problem in below configurations:

    multilib configuration 1:
    MACHINE="qemumips64"
    MULTILIBS ?= "multilib:lib32 multilib:libn32"
    DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32 ?= "mips"
    DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-libn32 ?= "mips64-n32"
    MULTILIB_GLOBAL_VARIANTS_append = " libn32"
    require conf/multilib.conf

    ignoring nonexistent directory "<path>/sysroots/mips64-poky-
linux/usr/include/c++/8.2.0/mips64-poky-linux/32

    multilib configuration 2:
    MACHINE="qemumips64"
    MULTILIBS = 'multilib:lib64 multilib:lib32'
    DEFAULTTUNE = 'mips64-n32'
    DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib64 = 'mips64'
    DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32 = 'mips32r2'
    require conf/multilib.conf

    For this configuration:
    for target gcc-runtime, need to create symlink like mips64-poly-
linux --> mips64-poky-linux-gnu32
    for target lib64-gcc-runtime, need to create symlink like mips64-
poly-linux/32 --> mips64-pokymllib64-linux
    in order to avoid conflict during populate_sdk, create symlink
for subfoler bits/ext for target gcc-runtime,
    this is ugly, but seems no better way to cover all kinds of
configuration.

    single lib configuration:
    MACHINE="qemumips64"
    DEFAULTTUNE = "mips64-n32"

Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
---
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc | 29 +++++++++++++++++--
----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
I haven't looked into why and it took a bit of narrowing down to find
the commit responsible but this is still causing a failure on the
autobuilder:

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/44/builds/285

Hi, Richard

I checked this problem,  this autobuilder fail seems not related to this patch.

it is failed as:

Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides lib64-lttng-modules needed by lib64-packagegroup-core-tools-profile-1.0-r3.0.qemux86'

but one place weird is I cannot reproduce this error locally with same configuration.

This is my lib64-packagegroup-core-tools-profile.spec:

Requires: lib64-powertop
Requires: lib64-systemtap
Requires: lib64-valgrind
Requires: lttng-modules
Recommends: lib64-blktrace


Requires should be lttng-modules  and not lib64-lttng-modules.  lib64-lttng-modules should have been replace to lttng-modules.

during do_package_rpm->mapping_rename_hook->get_package_mapping. 


I checked history of this part of code,  it should not have change recently,  so my local code should same as autobuildler, so I don't

quite understand why autobuilder failed.   


If possible, could you help to check on the build server of the autobuilder ? Thanks.

Hi, Richard

I  tested the scenario of the failed build with this patch and the latest poky distro.  It can build success.  Also,  the fauilure seems not

related to this patch.


Could you try again build this patch on autobuilder?  Thanks

Cheers,

Richard


-- 
BRs

Sandy(Li Changqing)

-- 
BRs

Sandy(Li Changqing)