From: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>
To: Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com>
Cc: Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>,
Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>,
Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com>,
Tamilarasi Muthamizhan <tmuthami@redhat.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
"Durgin, Josh" <jdurgin@redhat.com>,
"Just, Samuel" <sjust@redhat.com>,
"Dillaman, Jason" <dillaman@redhat.com>,
John Spray <jspray@redhat.com>,
"Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda" <yehuda@redhat.com>,
"ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hammer 0.94.10 QE status
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 20:52:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c713c1b-b01b-ed10-dc06-6ffc5e9f0aa6@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4mKGaM2cO7QjAcYgmnTKWE8Bq+WTKi_Pd5+h4gkpOKeN0kCg@mail.gmail.com>
> I've no idea what's broken there, so eg more valgrind failures are not
> a big deal, but if the upgrade itself is failing in some way that's
> going to be a problem. o_O
Hi Greg,
Let me try to clarify :-)
If someone reports problems upgrading their firefly cluster to hammer,
and the problem is in firefly, will we publish a new firefly release?
If someone reports problems upgrading their dumpling cluster to firefly,
and the problem is in dumpling, will we publish a new dumpling release?
I don't know the answer to those questions, but such a release -- if
published -- would be "out-of-band" with regard to what is written in
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/doc/releases.rst#understanding-the-release-cycle
- in particular this:
"Every other stable releases is a LTS (Long Term Stable) and will
receive updates until two LTS are published. For instance Dumpling is
retired when Hammer is published, Firefly is retired when Jewel is
published etc."
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-17 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAMMFjmHCAM6wmygytBDqwh89UOEex24_GGqrLJvXcOUS+QEg9A@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-01 17:03 ` hammer 0.94.10 QE status Ilya Dryomov
2017-02-02 10:01 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-02-02 11:17 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-07 21:47 ` Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-08 21:14 ` Yuri Weinstein
[not found] ` <CAObvjwPb_PosEnGOXP2tV4aWjnTyed7-275svyK+vu4uxYdTzQ@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-13 16:24 ` Sage Weil
2017-02-14 14:30 ` Orit Wasserman
2017-02-14 15:04 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-14 17:46 ` Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-17 5:06 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-17 14:14 ` Sage Weil
2017-02-17 18:55 ` Gregory Farnum
2017-02-17 19:52 ` Nathan Cutler [this message]
2017-02-17 23:21 ` Gregory Farnum
2017-02-18 8:19 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-18 8:39 ` Nathan Cutler
2017-02-14 17:05 ` Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-01 19:12 ` John Spray
2017-02-01 16:55 Yuri Weinstein
2017-02-01 20:36 ` Sage Weil
2017-02-01 23:47 ` Vasu Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c713c1b-b01b-ed10-dc06-6ffc5e9f0aa6@suse.cz \
--to=ncutler@suse.cz \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dillaman@redhat.com \
--cc=gfarnum@redhat.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jdurgin@redhat.com \
--cc=jspray@redhat.com \
--cc=owasserm@redhat.com \
--cc=sjust@redhat.com \
--cc=sweil@redhat.com \
--cc=tmuthami@redhat.com \
--cc=yehuda@redhat.com \
--cc=yweinste@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.