From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F19C4332F for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 07:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBC7611EF for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 07:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234431AbhJSHVA (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 03:21:00 -0400 Received: from proxima.lasnet.de ([78.47.171.185]:44552 "EHLO proxima.lasnet.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229695AbhJSHU7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 03:20:59 -0400 Received: from [IPv6:2003:e9:d74b:bb71:f660:f6a1:9bf9:60bf] (p200300e9d74bbb71f660f6a19bf960bf.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:e9:d74b:bb71:f660:f6a1:9bf9:60bf]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: stefan@datenfreihafen.org) by proxima.lasnet.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A7DAC050A; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:18:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=datenfreihafen.org; s=2021; t=1634627922; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=py9gkOp2xo053DN39ARED1V0IJZyIE4Yq2gOUzuNvas=; b=Q4FIZJzFpjp2+tZvPEa0+jXnQ5UJEY0Um8MeF8Cb7+nZ6azi2qo1BZ/hmIT7kJRLMhuKq6 FhoQijjAv6kAgdf8HTmb0b6ctfO4Od82tPumF8hlcybsnbGToiUqAJpUXyopTiZyhTs70I 3dYgqZoCrVVEiOr3gqaOi3TboGHpIwzUJ+bZSZM3beGKx0XFfoY5CK7gU82bhcScZrSS5N u1Vnwu/O1iefLxb4iCyUZoWhkCTvpLrFo+6/CvLg0xSH4F1Pb3/ODrEoCg+qCr2+xtPOu/ 06URfzq+z3/3jgoQqoaPq+WcxhGI4o5SZGirXDVqjoUxsRXxSgooyEFcG9vqUA== Subject: Re: [PATCH] ieee802154: Remove redundant 'flush_workqueue()' calls To: Jakub Kicinski , Christophe JAILLET Cc: h.morris@cascoda.com, alex.aring@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <0a080522-a30b-8b78-86d2-66c1c1a5f604@datenfreihafen.org> <20211018141452.544931a7@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Stefan Schmidt Message-ID: <9d1d9607-ffc8-1a01-075c-dccc54eb0373@datenfreihafen.org> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:18:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211018141452.544931a7@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Jakub. On 18.10.21 23:14, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 22:54:52 +0200 Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> I have nothing else in my ieee802154 tree for net right now so it would >> be great if you could take it directly. > > Do you mean net or net-next? This looks like net-next material. Yes, net-next, please. > Just to be sure, applying directly is not a problem. > Thanks. regards Stefan Schmidt