All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "anna.schumaker@netapp.com" <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
	"chuck.lever@oracle.com" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] NFS: Zero-stateid SETATTR should first return delegation
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:17:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e28664e90438384be654a39b23c6d517959c15a.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159872131590.1096729.3952588635826859724.stgit@manet.1015granger.net>

On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 13:16 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> If a write delegation isn't available, the Linux NFS client uses
> a zero-stateid when performing a SETATTR.
> 
> NFSv4.0 provides no mechanism for an NFS server to match such a
> request to a particular client. It recalls all delegations for that
> file, even delegations held by the client issuing the request. If
> that client happens to hold a read delegation, the server will
> recall it immediately, resulting in an NFS4ERR_DELAY/CB_RECALL/
> DELEGRETURN sequence.
> 
> Optimize out this pipeline bubble by having the client return any
> delegations it may hold on a file before it issues a
> SETATTR(zero-stateid) on that file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Return the delegation only for NFSv4.0 mounts
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index dbd01548335b..bca7245f1e78 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -3314,6 +3314,8 @@ static int _nfs4_do_setattr(struct inode
> *inode,
>  			goto zero_stateid;
>  	} else {
>  zero_stateid:
> +		if (server->nfs_client->cl_minorversion == 0)
> +			nfs4_inode_return_delegation(inode);

So, the intention is that nfs4_inode_make_writeable() takes care of
this, and in principle it is done in the cases that matter in
nfs4_proc_setattr().

I agree that the zero_stateid case is not currently being taken care
of, but that only matters for the case of truncate. So perhaps we can
just add a single call to nfs4_inode_make_writeable() above the
zero_stateid label instead of adding redundancy for all the other
cases?

>  		nfs4_stateid_copy(&arg->stateid, &zero_stateid);
>  	}
>  	if (delegation_cred)
> 
> 
-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com



  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-29 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-29 17:16 [PATCH v2] NFS: Zero-stateid SETATTR should first return delegation Chuck Lever
2020-08-29 21:17 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2020-08-29 22:28   ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e28664e90438384be654a39b23c6d517959c15a.camel@hammerspace.com \
    --to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.