From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1CCC43461 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1B6221EB for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725828AbgIKUxE (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:53:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56606 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725811AbgIKUxC (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:53:02 -0400 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:4433::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A528C061573; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kGq2W-002Ob1-5x; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:53:00 +0200 Message-ID: <9f992ca7731f966fdc45a38a13c202898e92f2b2.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Fix radiotap header channel flag for 6GHz band From: Johannes Berg To: Aloka Dixit Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:52:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <010101747eef4d8b-8b5fdae5-790f-4d19-a2df-fba00350baa3-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> References: <010101747ab7b9c0-45fa1c2a-3bb5-44e8-8e6d-457cad2e9845-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <1cc7242cd00cd5141a56f17a7f5c80700485aa39.camel@sipsolutions.net> <010101747eef4d8b-8b5fdae5-790f-4d19-a2df-fba00350baa3-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 20:50 +0000, Aloka Dixit wrote: > > > Not that anything even cares ... so there's no point in adding a 6GHz > > flag to radiotap. > > > Separate flag for 6GHz would have been best option, but I still think > better to set 5GHz as 6GHz frequencies start in 5GHz range. But why? wireshark probably needs to be adjusted anyway, so it can just look at the frequency instead? And it would pretend that it's now an "11a" frame ... so that clearly never was important, since that hasn't been true since HT. johannes