From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C71E0C43334 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 04:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=shelob.surriel.com) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1o3rqe-0001N1-A8; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:20:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1o3rqb-0001Ms-OE for kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:20:09 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id o9so12895123edt.12 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:20:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UtN/u0Ir2paj4k6deHH8VOJmpDur/kVvbz3UsHZmI5M=; b=MNf/vrwwfomBg0/UUm0GY6iW8hXT0cc7byXCLltsSGpU6VkHh9OfFU8ezmtFphIfNC 8TxmvDSj1nFjiIIMT2CHn35bVENeMKdupg6zXE4P4yOyAkZ+Pp6602BOp74ZBwKVnYab 1laEKI0hZnwvvIgmhPY85g278C26+T3E4CL9b0vTqzewH3uKA/nRyps7V/OdLqliWhnQ KIEylvOYUN5INkP/DX40XanYuC/PYnfIpBNWhN1enDxinII7512iuW+OQ/nYSwOFbLOZ FB1nfoivxRynxN7RFWtBeJJ9gOTG4wRtQI0Wox91jjjeKEaq1tphX1xJY52FWBvFICD2 dUvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UtN/u0Ir2paj4k6deHH8VOJmpDur/kVvbz3UsHZmI5M=; b=eDM7koHL8rY01dmZvwuVHuMdCf2eahHgM2SqW/3mrCX+GNnPcMEdwSb7RrnPZJuCAE i1QEXb6OosJ+amjGGd5nbmJ8u1ekk1w2q+4XU9JhoEZxA1p6FPsihPdQjudS5ZGu+kW/ OIsrvR7Jo1dQHlUvcr7g+nrcshBh/EbUCxHmQ5Zvc/P6mQqqFUT9aHFt3o6VIUnK2E4r cPOjQNZ9cSrC7RS/6Ik2JjvdeKYtXvqPMlCvBv9+8DBd2xDq2oQe0VigLh0baEpr4j8O Avz1ncIxE6zCwwAxVnP/Av+lG5N7ecLpFWW+d5UBi+QcwxZQvpy9etrddMb8B8b6HMAc TO6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8hAT8nDfzTYiug+10PxIC5nClfqKDUFcpV9btZMVkS0JdGBDL9 RjFFc2ENMVP/nwKx56reabJihHB+OMA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1takLSmCS4GeSUWc7zU2aKLwFPid1KXWA9w9sZRBzRDmmQBy2vY6/3ah23MAc6ySmRLS93QAA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1d4a:b0:42e:93de:17f4 with SMTP id dz10-20020a0564021d4a00b0042e93de17f4mr1859229edb.8.1655871607823; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:c7:8f2e:6905:1613:c000:1ff0:1715? (p200300c78f2e69051613c0001ff01715.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:c7:8f2e:6905:1613:c000:1ff0:1715]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y21-20020a056402441500b0042dcbc3f302sm14607672eda.36.2022.06.21.21.20.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9fa37c18-e6a1-f33d-3f58-1bd4490fe767@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 06:20:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: When reviewers stop responding Content-Language: en-US To: Greg KH , Ian Pilcher References: <6dc9577f-2628-4f3f-b7f0-f0df8e7cb35b@gmail.com> From: Philipp Hortmann In-Reply-To: Cc: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-BeenThere: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Learn about the Linux kernel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org On 6/7/22 19:23, Greg KH wrote: > And again, please help review code, otherwise you are just asking others > to do work for you, which if you think about it, could be construed as a > bit selfish, and I don't think you mean it to be. Hi Greg, this applies to me. I promise to improve. But this topic is not enough advertised. Everywhere information about patches can be found. But how to do a correct Reviewed-by: or Tested-by: is not so good documented. I bought hardware to improve and did one "Tested-by:" of the patch: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fixed some coding style issues and spelling from Chang Yu https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/91c9a0de-76f8-37fb-31b4-4401a6e35d48@gmail.com/T/#t Did I do something wrong or was I just unlucky? Is 24 hours quick enough response? Thanks for your support. Bye Philipp _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies