All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
To: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"3chas3@gmail.com" <3chas3@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/e1000: do not error out if rx_drop_en is set
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:25:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A2573D2ACFCADC41BB3BE09C6DE313CA07E4C620@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1539008063.8721.22.camel@debian.org>

Acked-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luca Boccassi [mailto:bluca@debian.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 10:14 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; 3chas3@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: do not error out if rx_drop_en is
> set
> 
> On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 08:43 +0000, Zhao1, Wei wrote:
> > Hi,  Luca Boccassi
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Luca Boccassi
> > > Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 1:26 AM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi
> > > <bluca@debian.org>; stable@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/e1000: do not error out if
> > > rx_drop_en is set
> > >
> > > rx_drop_en is an optimization that does nothing on single-queue
> > > devices like e1000. Do not force applications that do not care to
> > > select per- devices
> >
> > And aslo, eth_em_rx_queue_setup support set up of multiple queues for
> > EM device.
> >
> > > optimizations flags by returning an error, just log it and carry on.
> >
> > rx_drop_en is a flag to enable receive packets drop when insufficient
> > receive descriptors exist to write the packet into system memory.
> > if we delete this parameter check protection, it may be misleading
> > some applications for this point, why does not give some requirement
> > for proper usage of this? I do not suggest for this change.
> > You can also refer to function eth_igb_rx_queue_setup(), igb device
> > support rx_drop_en set, so we do not have a such parameter check.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As mentioned, because given it does nothing it's not worth aborting the
> program with an error. Logging a notice level message and carrying on is
> sufficient.
> We should try not make it harder than necessary for application developers.
> 
> > >
> > > Fixes: 805803445a02 ("e1000: support EM devices (also known as
> > > e1000/e1000e)")
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c | 7 ++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c
> > > b/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c index a6b3e92a6..81dc41efb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c
> > > @@ -1416,12 +1416,13 @@ eth_em_rx_queue_setup(struct
> rte_eth_dev
> > > *dev,
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	/*
> > > -	 * EM devices don't support drop_en functionality
> > > +	 * EM devices don't support drop_en functionality.
> > > +	 * It's an optimization that does nothing on single-queue
> > > devices,
> > > +	 * so just log the issue and carry on.
> > >  	 */
> > >  	if (rx_conf->rx_drop_en) {
> > > -		PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "drop_en functionality not
> > > supported
> > > by "
> > > +		PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE, "drop_en functionality not
> > > supported by "
> > >  			     "device");
> > > -		return -EINVAL;
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	/* Free memory prior to re-allocation if needed. */
> > > --
> > > 2.18.0
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Kind regards,
> Luca Boccassi

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-10  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-27 17:26 [PATCH] net/e1000: do not error out if rx_drop_en is set Luca Boccassi
2018-09-26 10:22 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-10-08  8:43 ` Zhao1, Wei
2018-10-08 14:14   ` Luca Boccassi
2018-10-10  7:25     ` Zhao1, Wei [this message]
2018-10-10 17:57       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-10-08  9:49 ` Zhao1, Wei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A2573D2ACFCADC41BB3BE09C6DE313CA07E4C620@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com \
    --to=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
    --cc=3chas3@gmail.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.