From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA67AC3A59E for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BAA23403 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=miegl.cz header.i=@miegl.cz header.b="LwyMrXVY" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730162AbfHUUEk (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:04:40 -0400 Received: from ocelot.miegl.cz ([195.201.216.236]:32916 "EHLO ocelot.miegl.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730101AbfHUUEk (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:04:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=miegl.cz; s=dkim; t=1566417879; bh=FhEuM75JSwv2f3jUUulqO/7P8r95SVUv1s3Mlq52qjE=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:CC:From; b=LwyMrXVYxTkDtfgPdz/9JxA90egj9V+WuItC6vMLRgf/Hq2c1QcTUHkVlpAgHQWVg tpF/WlRxAoSp5akzet0m9BH222fVqTBPmSVzJpEB/avdAbQF3j64TMHFQuAn2jrrDk UCDzZKjIYbCAQwnmw4n5WtwkSU/k9BjZFbDmh6lSLUmNvDRmWGS3kKhuspRGEWIrUL woyc8zjnFz/v7PAZVN8R9pNqkfbfOP8L+0NjNvGVFwPnu8qrxCCZd0cs+xvSLsozT9 NaIKxiGQSBiVLkXf3u2NNKflU27ZjdVAENGmNvKrNnpfhfAtOg8vijFAZ6Gt20qRSC HaJUcc1if5Bow== Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:04:37 +0200 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <20190815152844.k5mmddvbwrohkzr6@pepin-laptop.localdomain> <3a079683-6f57-3b42-f909-90c46e14f14f@newmedia-net.de> <20190816111044.4ntizgmpa3twbzcg@pepin-laptop.localdomain> <20190816113818.ohktykc4fyetzyvq@pepin-laptop.localdomain> <9985fddfb059640f36665efc9c1ef2dc0bdb7662.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20190819113706.ujsz67sxcwt2ulmt@pepin-laptop.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Implementing Mikrotik IE To: Johannes Berg CC: Sebastian Gottschall , linux-wireless From: Josef Miegl Message-ID: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On August 19, 2019 10:21:55 PM GMT+02:00, Johannes Berg wrote: >I don't know, try capturing over the air? > >Perhaps the vendor IEs added this way are added *first* before all the >RSN IEs, and that's tripping up your AP, and you'd have to add them >*after* the normal elements? Not really sure where/how they're added? > >johannes The vendor elements are added at the very end of the frame=2E In fact I tr= ied moving the RSN IE to the end of the frame so that the frame is similar = to the one ubnt airos produces=2E No luck either=2E One thing I've learned = is that ubnt airos assoc req frames have the WMM/WME IE placed before HT Ca= pabilities=2E But I'm not sure how to move it and also not sure if it would= actually work=2E I am getting 4WAY_HANDSHAKE_TIMEOUT=2E From capturing I can see the statio= n sends Key (msg 2 of 4) and a bunch of acknowledgements, but it never send= s Key (msg 4 of 4) afterwards=2E I feel like I'm stuck=2E=2E What could be the reason for this behaviour? Josef