All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Zhu Ebony-r57400" <ebony.zhu@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754 standard
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:28:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A85281E5-1E9C-4938-8940-CF696C3C5174@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32F3CC26D4DAC44E8ECD07155727A46E85D6E4@zch01exm20.fsl.freescale.net>


On Jan 25, 2007, at 2:25 AM, Zhu Ebony-r57400 wrote:

>
>> No, I think the round handler should try to do the rounding
>> by hand.
>> Since you have the non rounded information provided by HW,
>> its much simpler to just do the rounding step.
>
> Hi Kumar,
>
> I have some new thoughts about rounding handler.
> Suppose we set SPEFSCR[FRMC]=0b10 (rounding towards +Inf) and
> a normal "efsmul" may generate rounding interrupt. At this time,
> according
> to manual, unrounded (truncated) result is placed in the target
> register. Please
> note the target register contains a hexadecimal representation of a
> floating point number. Since it represents a floating point number
> exactly
> so we can not round it anymore.

I don't follow what you mean by not being able to round it anymore.

> Maybe we still need to emulate the whole "efsmul" instruction by
> software.

You can't always do that.  Think about the following instruction:

	efsmul	r3, r3, r3

You'll have lost the original value of r3 when the exception occurs.

- k

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-25  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-12  5:19 [patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754 standard Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-12  5:29 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-01-12  5:46   ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-12  8:27     ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-12 12:06       ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-15  8:41         ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-12  6:38   ` [patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754standard Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-12  6:49     ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-12 12:03     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-15  8:16       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-15 16:08         ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-12  6:41 ` [patch][0/5] powerpc: Add support to fully comply with IEEE-754 standard Kumar Gala
2007-01-12  8:09   ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-12 12:04     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-15  6:45       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-15 15:54         ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-12 18:36     ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-15  6:37       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-15 14:37         ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-16  9:54           ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-25  8:25           ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-25  8:28             ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2007-01-25  8:53               ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-25 15:10                 ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-26  6:16                   ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-29 10:00                   ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-29 14:30                     ` Kumar Gala
2007-01-31  9:45                       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-01-31 14:48                         ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-01  9:35                           ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-07  5:52           ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-07  7:11             ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-07  7:21               ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-07  7:57                 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-07  8:04                   ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-08  3:50                   ` [patch][0/5] powerpc V2 : " Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-08  5:18                     ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-08  5:40                       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-08  7:06                       ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-08  7:15                         ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-08  8:08                           ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-02-08 17:18                             ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-09  5:15                               ` Zhu Ebony-r57400
2007-07-30 14:56                                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-31  3:36                                   ` Zhu Ebony-r57400

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A85281E5-1E9C-4938-8940-CF696C3C5174@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=ebony.zhu@freescale.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.